jerseyhotspur
Registered
since Etihad Airways would be the sponsor, do you think CFG would still call NYCFC's prospective stadium, "Etihad Stadium", just like the one in Manchester? or another variation?
Etihad Arena? Etihad Park?since Etihad Airways would be the sponsor, do you think CFG would still call NYCFC's prospective stadium, "Etihad Stadium", just like the one in Manchester? or another variation?
LAFC announced Banc of California (yes, I spelled it correctly) as their stadium sponsor. We know that if/when we built a SSS that Etihad will be our stadium sponsor. That being said, if it wasn't, who would you want as the sponsor? This likely has been discussed probably 120-150 pages ago, but it's been some time since then...
Still wanting on that table of contents, NYCFC Intern!
since Etihad Airways would be the sponsor, do you think CFG would still call NYCFC's prospective stadium, "Etihad Stadium", just like the one in Manchester? or another variation?
Probably, but the one advantage we have is that our owners have far larger pockets to spend to get a stadium.FYI guys, I've been on Big Soccer for what must be years watching threads on DC United's plan to build a stadium.
Unfortunately we will be experiencing the same thing.
Forum consensus has been Etihad Island
Not sure if it's ever been said but Sheikh Mansour (the rich multimillionaire oil tycoon/businessman who is funding city football group and funding the expensive transfers for Manchester City for those of you who don't know that) his cousin owns Etihad Airways. He paid MCFC an absurd jersey sponsor price to help beat financial fair play when that was the hot topic in Europe a few years back. Anyway, we're staying with Etihad until the cousin is no longer the owner of Etihad or Shiekh Mansour is not longer the owner of CFG.If we see a change at Man City or Melbourne City, or unless someone makes a big enough bid, we're locked into Etihad. Not only have they sponsored us, they are a sponsored of MLS. They're committed to American advertising.
Agreed. Could have been worse. Something like BimboEtihad is fine. It's a pretty neutral name that doesn't sound like a company. Unlike CAMPING WORLD STADIUM. Terrible. Their branding is very low key as well. Which makes them pretty ideal as a sponsor on a stadium/kit. We got lucky.
The existence of a capital-based ownership agreement between CFG and the Yankees, and the lease for use of Yankee Stadium alters the understanding of NYCFC’s incentives to eventually build and manage their own stadium. If the cost of the lease begins to exceed the revenue needed to turn a profit, the Club will have to look towards building their own stadium to reduce annual expenditures by not pay a landlord.
However, based on statements from the organizations, it appears NYCFC is squarely in the black, and attendance numbers seem to indicate prolonged interest in the club. With the Yankees 20% ownership interest, it’s unlikely that NYCFC’s revenue is being affected enough to persuade them to spend exorbitant amounts of money to build and maintain their own stadium.
I'd love to have a chance to host an MLS Cup Final while we still play at Yankee Stadium. The STU agreement does not guarantee us a ticket to a Final, because they have to allocate to the other team, the league, sponsors, league partners, etc. In YS there's room enough that most or even all STHs might be able to attend, even if not in our usual seats.
Posts like this will not endear you to the SAC (Seat Allocation Committee).When that happens and they don't give me my Pitchside Seats, I will write, call, and possibly even show up in person to the NYCFC and MLS offices demanding my seats given I likely spend the most expensive single season ticket in MLS. Fuck you, Don!
Mr. Garber will be sitting in your seats laughing all night long!!!!When that happens and they don't give me my Pitchside Seats, I will write, call, and possibly even show up in person to the NYCFC and MLS offices demanding my seats given I likely spend the most expensive single season ticket in MLS. Fuck you, Don!