Yeah, I think we've covered that Lampard's signature is phallic-esque.
Well it said they explored it. I hope they explore every avenue. And though I'd probably benefit the most here from that location, I'm not sure it's really the best for the team and its fan base. It also said talks are dead, so let's hope they moved on. Maybe to Willets Point...
Also, maybe it was for a larger training complex and stadium for the Rough Riders or a USL team?
Most likely, just simple due diligence. Still a bit frightening that they're even exploring sites outside the boroughs.
Also, maybe it was for a larger training complex and stadium for the Rough Riders or a USL team?
Most likely, just simple due diligence. Still a bit frightening that they're even exploring sites outside the boroughs.
If they end up at Belmont, I'll drop my three tickets immediately.They have every right to explore EVERY avenue.
And we have every right to tell them that a team based out of Belmont is a Long Island team and not a NYC team. Good luck getting anyone from the suburbs or Manhattan to attend your games.
Anywhere outside of the four boros, really.If they end up at Belmont, I'll drop my three tickets immediately.
They have every right to explore EVERY avenue.
And we have every right to tell them that a team based out of Belmont is a Long Island team and not a NYC team. Good luck getting anyone from the suburbs or Manhattan to attend your games.
Not for anything more than research. Most of the proposed LI spots have communities that are very very very strongly anti-stadium.
Not for anything more than research. Most of the proposed LI spots have communities that are very very very strongly anti-stadium.
Do you really think they will ever be in a position to say "no thanks, NYC, but please let us build at this better site"?and waiting for the best one.
Do you really think they will ever be in a position to say "no thanks, NYC, but please let us build at this better site"?
Omg. The women could like women, too. Don't be so parochial with your gender politics.Dude, the Forums have both men and women posters. Surely there was a better analogy you could have used?!?
Omg. The women could like women, too. Don't be so parochial with your gender politics.
Nah, hardly. It's just not appropriate to the Forums to be using terminology like "plowing" or needing to beat up the husband to get the woman.Right? It's like we got Pat McCrory over here...
Nah, hardly. It's just not appropriate to the Forums to be using terminology like "plowing" or needing to beat up the husband to get the woman.
This.Nah, hardly. It's just not appropriate to the Forums to be using terminology like "plowing" or needing to beat up the husband to get the woman.