Here’s the counter to that: “you only play well when being sung to” is more of the issue.Too me that’s the same problem - “you only sing when you’re winning,” is not a compliment.
Here’s the counter to that: “you only play well when being sung to” is more of the issue.Too me that’s the same problem - “you only sing when you’re winning,” is not a compliment.
It wasn't the score. The team had no energy from the first minute. You were there. The crowd was amped at the start of the game. It was much more dynamic than I've ever felt at Yankee Stadium. The team came out flat anyway. Their only chance was on what should have been a penalty but wasn't called, but it was not like they were controlling the game to that point. After CR's first goal I thought the crowd tried to add some energy and the team did not respond. Same at the start of the second half.Too me that’s the same problem - “you only sing when you’re winning,” is not a compliment.
The flaw in the article is this (and I admittedly just skimmed it): that gap may not be a talent gap as the timing suggests it could have just been a Juergen selection gap. That period seems to coincide with the rise of the non-US born player. Who knows how many skilled US players that could have made an impact have been overlooked?
None of them, literally none of them.
Even with a pro foreign player selection bias, a coach still plays the best team he has available. If any of the native born American players were good enough they would have been on the team.
https://sports.yahoo.com/news/u-s--...due-to--lost-generation-205243565-soccer.html 2014
https://www.socceramerica.com/publi...23s-another-lost-generation-probably-not.html 2016
There was simply a generation of players, who are now between the ages of 22-30 who simply weren't good enough.
Here's what I think happened, the Bradly and Donovan generation was actually a golden generation for the US. They came out and played genuinely high level soccer coming from a basically non existent development system, or a system that was at best pay to play and of much lower quality than overseas.
The current crop of players in their prime are basically the average high end of what that shitshow of a youth development system is capable of producing. And now with a lot of the 16-18 year old we are seeing what happens when the USSF manages to get professional clubs to institute a European style development system; lots of good players and a few great ones.
The 2018 World Cup cycle will probably be the USMNT's most talent deprived for the foreseeable and unforeseeable future. That's simply due to the fact that we are transitioning between a probable golden generation and the systematized development plan of the future.
I just don’t see a European style development system. There are still pay-to-play (some) and non-residency (almost all) MLS academies and the teams spend so much time playing against crap pay-to-play clubs. And most of the best U20s weren’t even developed by MLS academies - if they played MLS at all, they were poached at 13+.
Your first sentence is contradictory - if there is selection bias, by definition he’s not fielding the best team possible. Guys like McCarty, Feilhaber, Klestjan (although not born in that gap period) are examples of players that the bias impacted.
I’d say there was selection bias against Feilhaber because his attitude was reportedly always shit. He was the best creative player in the CM position, and he let everybody know it and pouted when not selected; while not wrong with his estimation of his abilities, he was cancerous.I just don’t see a European style development system. There are still pay-to-play (some) and non-residency (almost all) MLS academies and the teams spend so much time playing against crap pay-to-play clubs. And most of the best U20s weren’t even developed by MLS academies - if they played MLS at all, they were poached at 13+.
Your first sentence is contradictory - if there is selection bias, by definition he’s not fielding the best team possible. Guys like McCarty, Feilhaber, Klestjan (although not born in that gap period) are examples of players that the bias impacted.
Many things have been described as "Peak Concacaf", but does anything really top this video?
I wonder if this will make the us sports media take soccer more or less seriously. Like will we get the 2 page nytimes/Washington post editorial on how it went wrong or will it just be a blurb next to coverage on the MLB playoffs? Hopefully the former, more likely the latter.
The sad thing is that 12 year old kids aren't watching Christian Pulisic play in the World Cup.I tuned into SportsCenter immediately after the final whistle. Taylor Twellman had an immediate reaction. This was on ESPN NEWS. They at 11 PM, SportsCenter went to ESPN 2. It was the talking point for the first 10 minutes. Taylor was front and center talking about it. They got Bob Ley on the phone too who has been broadcasting soccer since the 80s. Maybe there will be clips tomorrow but on the national sports media cycle, NFL Week 6 starts on Thursday, the NBA season is kicking off, it's the MLB playoffs. American soccer will be lost in this country for the next 5 years.
Nike will lose jersey sales. FOX will lose ratings. Advertisers will pull out. We're in critical condition right now.
This is still largely a niche sport in this country. It's a mix of fans who love the game and kids who pay to play. And that's a combination that doesn't work.