Of course, but the best you're looking at is a tie if you're playing perfect defense but can't score. At least having a solid offense will give you a puncher's chance. I'd rather win 3-2, knowing we could count on at least 2 goals per game than have a defense that allows 1 per game, and we sit there, praying for a goal. You can't win unless you score. How many DP defenders are out there? A handful?Its not just about the amount of goals given up. Its about the stupid mistakes, poor marking, and poor overall play of the back line.
Did you see the game last night? Did you hear the color commentator call one of our players actions stupid after an unnecessary blind clearance that almost lead to a goal? Remember in the first half...I forget who it was...but while facing goal with no attackers near him, one of our defenders tried to clear the ball with an over head kick. Of course it went right to the front line of Real Salt Lake, and Saunders had to bail us out yes again.
When I saw that clearance attempt though, I knew it would be a long night. Thats just poor...and lacks awareness. He had all day to turn around and pass the ball or properly clear it...but nope. If it wasnt for Saunders this team would have easily given up twice as many goals.
I'm not entirely sure, though, a simple attacking player will solve anything, and really, a third DP will arrive (hopefully) at the same time as Lamps, making our team identity pretty different. There would be benefits to either, but I think this team would more obviously benefit from an exceptional offensive player than an exceptional defensive player.