I was just looking at the MLS Roster Rules and Regulations and felt like I was buying a Blimpie franchise.
Dave, good stuff, I look forward to future healthy discussions man.
They are all pretty funny!
I'll stay out of the mud. Happy holidays!
If I am honest, I like the popcorn eating guy better. That face he makes is priceless.I see your popcorn gif and raise you my personal favourite, popcorn cat:
Thanks for putting that together.
Duka has family in NY and is from the area and he is a pretty good mid. I would love to have him with NYCFC.
Only way NYCFC could realistically get him is to offer him a multi year contract where first year he makes below DP threshold and then the next year when we can get a new DP, he makes an absurd amount. Which I don't even know if that is allowed.
This:Only way NYCFC could realistically get him is to offer him a multi year contract where first year he makes below DP threshold and then the next year when we can get a new DP, he makes an absurd amount. Which I don't even know if that is allowed.
Otherwise teams could sign as many DPs as they wanted.It's not. They take total compensation, including bonus, and divide it by the length of the contract.
Interestingly, that's exactly what the Mets did with Bobby Bonilla. He last played for them in 1999, and they'll be paying him over a million a year through 2035.This:
Otherwise teams could sign as many DPs as they wanted.
DPs 1-3 get their balloon salaries this year.
DPs 4-6 get their balloon salaries next year.
DPs 7-9 get their balloon salaries the following year.
And so on.
The smartest contract any athlete has ever signed. It sets him and his family up for generations and generations instead of becoming yet another sports star that ends up broke.Interestingly, that's exactly what the Mets did with Bobby Bonilla. He last played for them in 1999, and they'll be paying him over a million a year through 2035.
Amusing details: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/07/new-york-mets-bobby-bonilla-contract-2035-deal
The smartest contract any athlete has ever signed. It sets him and his family up for generations and generations instead of becoming yet another sports star that ends up broke.
The article linked above claims that the Mets came out ahead and Bonilla lost if you assume an 8% annual rate. I did not check their math. But it wasn't by a huge amount even then and steady 8% is pretty high. Some hit that, but most don't. He maybe could have done better but this was, at the least, a good solid deal for him.Eh, not exactly. While the annuity stream is nice (and it's a large number), depending on how he is with his money, he may have been better off with taking a larger sum of money up front with no guaranteed cash flow. You would have to discount the value of that $1 Million over time, factoring in the lack of growth and opportunity cost for further investment. The value of $1 Million today is less than it was 20 years ago on an inflation adjusted basis.
The article linked above claims that the Mets came out ahead and Bonilla lost if you assume an 8% annual rate. I did not check their math. But it wasn't by a huge amount even then and steady 8% is pretty high. Some hit that, but most don't. He maybe could have done better but this was, at the least, a good solid deal for him.
It may have been that they agreed to pay him more if he agreed to the deferred payment