It’s a rumor floated by Parkhurst’s agent.
Or Amagat’s agent to show old players are still in demand on Dome-run teams.It’s a rumor floated by Parkhurst’s agent.
As was mentioned on twitter, he’s free and that’s all that CFG cares about.Two possibilities.
1 - The Club values Parkhurst more than someone else and is willing to sign MP on a free and deal another player for AM.
2 - Dome wants to switch to a 3-man back line and that requires more depth.
The argument for this move is that he steps into the money we saved by letting go of Wallace and McNamara.
My concern is that I would rather see us go get another ITS with that $400k than a surplus CB.
It's a risk reward question. Granted Parkhurst has some injury risk due to age but he's a known performer in the MLS. I'm also not sure we need another CB but ITS types have consistently been high risk high reward for us. We've had some serious misses in the $300K-$800K range. ITS has been great but we've also had, Mendoza, Carmargo, Hountondji, Ofori, and Berget. Again I'm not sure Parkhurst is the best option but I wouldn't mind the team mixing in some proven MLS guys with the international dice rolls to offset the risk a bit.
Which teams have signed impact DPs or made material improvements?What a nightmare offseason so far
Lose Villa
Only real positive is extending Chanot...?
Zero upgrades for a team that completely bottomed out
Which teams have signed impact DPs
What a nightmare offseason so far
Lose Villa
Only real positive is extending Chanot...?
Zero upgrades for a team that completely bottomed out
Nor should he be after seeing demonstrated lack of playing time for HG in year 1 of signing.Haak in no hurry