Maxi was signed 3.5 weeks before the first public Santi rumor. Maybe Lee had no idea Santi might leave when he signed Maxi, but to me Occam's Razor says Maxi was signed to play the 10 as much as he was healthy for, and to run him into the ground in case Santi was sold.
I get these arguments. I think there is a higher level fundamental issue. We are looking at Santi and Maxi as the CAM question. For me, more broadly it is a question of consistently fully utilizing the DP mechanism. It is the most powerful performance lever available to every team.He got hurt, he hasn’t produced at a higher level, he allowed Lee an excuse to further sit on his hands, and we continue to struggle just hoping to make the playoffs and lose. We should have signed a game changing CAM earlier (it can only be debated how far back that should have been).
Santi's departure gave Lee 8 weeks to replace a DP. Magno's departure gave Lee 7 months.
Imagine we had a DP striker. Santi leaves, but our front 4 are still Hannes, Alonso, Maxi, DP9. Or a DP winger keeps Alonso at the 9 with Hannes and Maxi. We lost Santi, but I'll bet on Maxi being better than bottom third with those 3 ahead of him. And with Santi there and Maxi as super sub, we are a contender.
The biggest issue isn't that Lee signed Maxi to play the 10. The biggest issue is that Lee (or I'd be willing to bet, CFG) are happy to not carry all 3 DP spots.