Screenshot from Christian Araos sent to me just now:View attachment 5791
Glad that Christian Araos finally apologized and made a statement, hopefully repairing NYCFC fans' reputation a bit, though I doubt that will spread in certain circles (read: RBNJ, Cosmos, anti-NYCFC nationally) as widely as his original, irresponsible tweet did.
And too bad it took him so long to do it. I respect and appreciate his apologizing publicly, but I don't respect that it likely took some serious arm-twisting and pressure from his boss and not his own f***ing conscience/sense of decency to do it in the first place. Whatever, at least it's out there.
And props to you, Rox, for having some influence in him finally doing it yourself. Keep up the good work in general, Sir, I know it can be a thankless job sometimes helping run the Third Rail.
Screenshot from Christian Araos sent to me just now:View attachment 5791
I debated whether I should respond to this and, if so, how I should respond.
I just have to keep it "a buck" here:
This is trash. Just as Christian's tweets and responses that lead to this point were trash. The whole speculation about "likely" arm-twisting from his superior at work and all that is unnecessary. I spoke to Christian at approximately 6 pm for roughly 20 minutes. At 6:30 pm he had work to do that took him a bit of time. Before 7:30 I had the message in my inbox. I don't see how or why you needed to add in speculation that has nothing to do with what actually happened. Is that not what we were just chastising him for?
He made a mistake. We talked through it as two men, privately, and found common ground. That's it.
Thank you for the kind words though. I appreciate it.
Rox I appreciate you speaking to him as always you're doing what's best for the club and it's fans. I appreciate the shit out of you man.
Glad you were able to connect with him and also appreciate what he did to rectify the situation. ThanksScreenshot from Christian Araos sent to me just now:View attachment 5791
Well, therein lies the problem. Bloggers push out (as fast as they can) anything that arises in connection to a topic while adding their own personal slant/opinion. An ethical journalist not only looks for confirmation from min 2 sources but also edits the information to clear out clutter, innuendo, and snark.Glad you were able to talk with him as well Rox, thanks for taking that initiative as well as all the other hard work you do for the Third Rail. I know it is often quite underappreciated, but I really do appreciate the amount of work you put into this.
The apology Christian put out works. It doesn't really make me gain more respect for him though. I think a lot of the points Nick Chavez points out above carry some weight. Again, this isn't some random guy that blogs to himself. He is a NYCFC writer for one of the top soccer sites in the city and I really think we deserve better. I hope Christian has learned a valuable lesson here in regards to journalism and the impact that writing a story can have, especially when not all of the facts are lined up (and in this case, there were never any facts and blaring holes in the rumor that was started that I think most high school newspaper writers would not feel comfortable reporting on.)
I really hope Christian puts out quality work here going forward, but its honestly going to be quite a while before I can take anything he writes or tweets with any kind of weight.
And looking at his Twitter timeline, the only tweet that was deleted was the "Flag Explained" tweet. These two still exist.....I was still a little disappointed by what he wrote. I appreciate the apology, but it was long and really avoided the big thing that is needed. A short, definitive statement that the Nazi flag rumor was false. Why can't he just tweet something like the below.
Last weekend, I tweeted about a rumor that NYCFC supporters had brought a Nazi flag to the game. I want to make clear that those rumors were completely FALSE.
I appreciate that shout out, but I'm not even on the level of being "press" just yet. Maybe after Friday though.EDIT: @NYCFCNation and NYCFCfan totally slipped my mind, my bad. They're usually way ahead of anyone anyways on breaking stories.
I appreciate that shout out, but I'm not even on the level of being "press" just yet. Maybe after Friday though.
And I'm PMing FootyLovin my name to add to the list too.
Great thought JayH , it could only help clean some of this up in the supporters section. Nick Chavez , what are your thoughts?And to get this thread back on original topic, Nick Chavez, as a man with his finger on the pulse, I would love your thoughts on the continuing puto chants, efforts to stop them, and those who refuse to comply. Have you thought about weighing in publicly given that you reach many of the supporters (including possibly the violators) directly?
And to get this thread back on original topic, Nick Chavez, as a man with his finger on the pulse, I would love your thoughts on the continuing puto chants, efforts to stop them, and those who refuse to comply. Have you thought about weighing in publicly given that you reach many of the supporters (including possibly the violators) directly?
Great thought JayH , it could only help clean some of this up in the supporters section. Nick Chavez , what are your thoughts?
This doesn't hold. If the end of the chant was the n-word, but it wasn't intended to be hateful towards blacks, no one would care about intentions. This shouldn't be different.Personally, I also don't find it as offensive as some because I look at the intention, and I know it's not being used to be "homophobic" or hateful/offensive towards gays.
Nick Chavez, we don't know each other, and I apologize for beginning with a critique, but I find your response to the P*to chant underwhelming.
This doesn't hold. If the end of the chant was the n-word, but it wasn't intended to be hateful towards blacks, no one would care about intentions. This shouldn't be different.
You are basically washing your hands of it and saying it's up to the supporters. But you are a vocal, known member of the community.
I'll give this to Araos, if he thought there was a Nazi flag in the SS, the right thing to do is to speak out against it. You have a platform and a voice that matters to some. Maybe you're right and trolls are gonna troll. But some people do listen to you. And to shrug your shoulders and say "not my problem" doesn't impress me.
If you were anyone else, I might not write this. But you have been extremely outspoken on this forum at various times critiquing the judgement and ethics of others covering NYCFC. Yet I see you setting a pretty low standard here on this issue.
I'm not certain I follow this particular line of thinking around the intentions of using the word. The word itself doesn't mean "F*** You", so why does it have that particular connotation when its being used in this regard?" It is a homophobic slur, so is it a "F*** You" because in essence, it being a homophobic slur is derogatory? Whether or not the intention is to be hateful towards the gay community?Personally, I also don't find it as offensive as some because I look at the intention, and I know it's not being used to be "homophobic" or hateful/offensive towards gays. I don't think it's ever used with that intention in stadiums. It's used to as like a big "F*** YOU!" to the goalkeeper and other team. I like to look at intention a lot in these situations. It's like, we probably all use the word "bastard" when we're pissed or something... we don't mean to upset/offend/or make any judgments of people who are born out of wed-lock when we do it. To me, it's analogous.