I could understand the anger and embrassment to a point. But my God it's the second year of a team, it takes several years to build up a viable team. Patience is tough, I feel bad for anyone who paid a ticket to go to the game and saw this. Derby loss is always tough but once they figure what to do with this team its gonna be even that more sweet down the line. Great times and bad times all come with being a football supporter.
So, here's the thing - we were shit. If people chant it, whatever. I wouldn't.
I'm probably the most critical person here. I mostly do it without profanity (profanity isn't part of my criticism, it just slips in as part of my vocab)
No problem with booing Lampard, of course. And I'll probably shout Saunders that he sucks every home match. He does. If he gets paid for a job he isn't qualified to do, he should take the abuse as a value add reason he's still in the squad.
The whole team was an embarrassment. The manager looked lost. Vitriolic responses are appropriate to me. If we sit up there grinning and clapping like a damn monkey, there is nothing that suggests to me that CFG wouldn't take that as approval of the job they are doing.
The FO needs to be made aware of how damn stupid they are. They sure as hell don't listen elsewhere, so we have to make our points when we can.
I left the match, went and drank beers and hung out with my friends, including a couple of Jersey reds. I wasn't mad at them or particularly bothered. The players weren't. Manager wasn't. Why would I have my evening ruined? But here on the forum or in the stadium, I'm going to let fly the vitriol.
"Supporter" (or "fan") means different things to different people. No one right answer. I get that.
It's easy to cheer your team when they are winning. The challenge of being a supporter is lifting your team up when they are down.
I expect to get eviscerated for this. (In my house there is a running joke of saying, "Kick him because he's different.") But I also wanted to have my say on an alternate way of being a supporter. Have at it my friends ...
I answered FootyLovin
I didn't mention Disney World in my prior answer by accident. That place is the "Happiest Place On Earth" and is Where Dreams Come True. The employees are called cast members and tell you to "have a magical day" at the end of many interactions. It's a show, and it's a something of a sham but it's not a fraud. Everyone except for the truly little ones understand what is going on. I embrace it because my family and I enjoy it. But I'm not fooled by it. I just willingly suspend the disbelief enough to get my enjoyment from it while paying for the privilege. Similarly, the club/supporter paradigm is something we as fans want to embrace and act as if it is true and real. There is no harm in that, but I never forget that it is a show. Just like Disney World. The ownership, league, and players are united and aligned 100% in trying to maximize revenue from me, and the paradigm is one of their biggest tools in their kit. This is now true in every major sports league.
I pay my money. I pretend my passion makes me part of a collective enterprise. But this is not my family, my church, my city or my country. It's a business, and I'm a paying customer.
This.- Criticism is always good but the method of doing so is vastly important. Take your anger out on here or in emails to the front office.
Not this. This is kicking your dog because you're angry at your boss. When you come back to work the next day, your boss feels none of the kick. The players are the ones who feel the abuse on the field. CFG feels it when they are hit in the wallet. As TabascoDiva put it, if this is what you want, don't buy the merch. Have at CFG on Twitter. But I think booing the players is misdirected anger.If we sit up there grinning and clapping like a damn monkey, there is nothing that suggests to me that CFG wouldn't take that as approval of the job they are doing.
The FO needs to be made aware of how damn stupid they are. They sure as hell don't listen elsewhere, so we have to make our points when we can.
You have every legal right up to what YS security allows. And as has already been reported, multiple members of this forum crossed that line. I don't cede that you have ever moral right or that these actions produce the affect you desire.i have the right as an individual to boo andget tight.
I think they have. They've given us first place last week. Second place this week - week 13. In our second year of existence that's more than is reasonable to expect IMO.I do expect them to do better than tied for the worst loss in the history of MLS
By "right way" do you mean that the tactics were poor or that they didn't try? Real question.For me, it's not the score but the way they played. I don't care if they lost every game, as long as they play the right way. They did not play the right way yesterday.
All true.Here's the thing though. Those are not the only two options as far as responses go. It's been said a few times already, you don't need to be cheering and grinning and clapping when we are losing and playing like shit. This ain't Stepford Supporters. But you also don't have to be shouting abuse at the players. Those are not the only two possible reactions, and I think it's disingenuous to imply that if you're upset then the team deserves vitriolic responses during gameplay, and if you don't give them that then you are a wind up monkey toy - there is a middle ground between those two extremes, as has already been mentioned.
I do respect the opinion that shouting at players who are pissing you off is a valid response. I mean my seats were near the corner last season and I did quite a bit of unwarranted shouting at opposing team members when they took corner kicks.
Lastly, one thing to remember is that there was a seemingly excessive/outsized response to that match - but it was an extreme fucking match to say the least. It was a spectacular shitshow of epic proportions, so one should expect a proportionate response. If it becomes a habit to throw balls back at players or to boo Lampard every time he takes the pitch, or for the bleachers to clear out whenever we're losing, then I'd say we have a problem with our supporter culture/behavior
AHABS, that was one of the most tone deaf announcements I've ever witnessed.
Bringing Super Frank in when down 5-0 was akin to a Friday news dump. I get why they did it and I despise management for it - it was one more instance of their bungling nature with the man. Just once, I'd like management to admit that they handled a Frank situation, any of them, incorrectly. Just once.All true.
I generally only berate Saunders. I guess I'm willing to risk an IIED suit in the hopes that it gets him dropped from the lineup.
If it becomes a habit to throw balls back at players or to boo Lampard every time he takes the pitch, or for the bleachers to clear out whenever we're losing, then I'd say we have a problem with our supporter culture/behavior
^That doesn't strike me as something we are in danger of facing, assuming we don't get a "SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR FRANK LAMPARD!!!!" announcement again when we're down a field goal and a safety. AHABS, that was one of the most tone deaf announcements I've ever witnessed. Apparently, good judgment isn't part of the job description for PA announcer. I am sure somewhere, Tom & Claudio tried to pull their Brioni over their respective heads.
I thought bringing in Lampard and Harrison at that point was a good move, one which I think had everything to do with Vieira managing the team well and nothing to do with the upper management of the club. You're getting blown out, it's the usual time in the match when you'd start bringing in subs anyway, why not get Lampard and Harrison their first minutes on the field when there's no pressure on them as the game's already gone? I'd much rather have Harrison's first MLS minutes happen in that sort of situation where he can get them under his belt in a no-pressure situation than to bring him on in a 1-1 deadlock you're desperately trying to win at the last minute. Same with Lampard, nobody was happy with that match, so why not bring him on? Everyone can boo, he can test his calf out, get rid of the first-minutes butterflies, that sort of thing.Bringing Super Frank in when down 5-0 was akin to a Friday news dump. I get why they did it and I despise management for it - it was one more instance of their bungling nature with the man. Just once, I'd like management to admit that they handled a Frank situation, any of them, incorrectly. Just once.
Harrison yes definitely. Even Lampard, but it still felt like a Friday news dump - everybody was so riled up, there was no way they could be any more angry.... oh wait.....I thought bringing in Lampard and Harrison at that point was a good move, one which I think had everything to do with Vieira managing the team well and nothing to do with the upper management of the club. You're getting blown out, it's the usual time in the match when you'd start bringing in subs anyway, why not get Lampard and Harrison their first minutes on the field when there's no pressure on them as the game's already gone? I'd much rather have Harrison's first MLS minutes happen in that sort of situation where he can get them under his belt in a no-pressure situation than to bring him on in a 1-1 deadlock you're desperately trying to win at the last minute. Same with Lampard, nobody was happy with that match, so why not bring him on? Everyone can boo, he can test his calf out, get rid of the first-minutes butterflies, that sort of thing.
I see no downside to Vieira doing this and much upside.
By "right way" do you mean that the tactics were poor or that they didn't try? Real question.
I saw a team that worked hard but had multiple mental lapses and was tactically out-coached. One could argue that as many mental lapses as we had was indicative of either our unpreparedness (coaching) or their being super sharp or both. Or one could argue that the early lapses are on the team and the later lapses were contributed to by their fans abusing them.
An ending I would like to have seen would be, Villa collecting all the players and walking them over to FACE US. Yes, we were disappointed and angry. Yes, they busted their asses this week and were surely more upset and disappointed than we are. Yet, had they walked to us TOGETHER and stood and faced us TOGETHER...
I'm of the mind that we could have had a special moment TOGETHER; even in crushing defeat.
THIS. would have been a huge statement. Call to mind my experience attending the Red Bulls shock 3-1 loss to the USL Harrisburg Islanders in 2012 in US open Cup 4th round. Yes, I followed the Red Bulls, the only game in town, prior to NYCFC announcement in 2013. The game was played in Harrisburg and a large number of supporters went over to the locker rooms following the game intent on demanding the players hand over their kits. The team actually came out in a line and shook hands, and apologized for the loss defusing the whole incident and humanizing the effect of the loss on them. It meant a lot. The loss was visible in their faces and demeanor. While not feasible in an MLS venue, R roxfontaine suggestion would have had the same effect on the fans
NYCFC means never having to admit you're supposed to say "I'm sorry."I'd like to add that last week RBNJ lost to DC (arguably their biggest rival and certainly their longest rivalry) in a flat performance and Dax immediately apologized to their fans. On the other hand all I've heard from Villa is that we have to forget about this and move on. Apologizing and/or taking some responsibility would go a long way to achieving that.