View attachment 11190
Tried to fix it to something more palatable. Any way you slice it...it's a boring logo.
One more try. Just get rid of the corner and balance it out with the SC. Kinda like the loons logo. Or DA logo
View attachment 11190
Tried to fix it to something more palatable. Any way you slice it...it's a boring logo.
One more try. Just get rid of the corner and balance it out with the SC. Kinda like the loons logo. Or DA logo
View attachment 11192
View attachment 11191
The shape of the crest is match the flag of Ohio
The shape of the crest is match the flag of Ohio
WRT outrage, I think this is a typical online situation where it is easy to misread volume for passion. There are a lot of people who think this is wrong or stupid, including me. There's so many in fact it feels like outrage, but on the spectrum of things I care about this barely registers, and I expect it's true for a lot of people. But it's the topic of the day so we all weighed in. Mix in a handful of people who might actually be outraged and the professional pot-stirrers who figure that outrage and vehemence generates clicks and it's pretty easy to overestimate the overall level of aggrievement.They are removing Crew from the official name and using it as a nickname instead. And they're keeping the colors. I'm not feeling the outrage. But that's just me.
However, the current logo is great and the proposed is a serious downgrade. So that's a headscratcher. Hopefully the leak was intentional to take the temperature of the fan base and they go back to the drawing board, or better yet, leave it alone.
Big 4 rebrands have usually been associated with location changes. Think of the Browns to Ravens, Oilers to Titans, Expos to Nationals, Supersonics to Thunder. The Nets kept their name when they moved to Brooklyn, but I'd still call that a complete rebrand.I just don't understand why all these teams feel the need to rebrand in MLS. It's a pretty unique thing to MLS in this country, too -- you never see teams in the big-4 sports rebranding. Changing a logo? Sure, occasionally. New jerseys all the time, too. But a complete rebrand? Aside from the Redskins and Indians, it just doesn't happen.
This idea that "Well if we just change our team name, the fans will come" seems pretty farcical. It's executives who need to justify their paycheck, and they do it by coming up with stuff like this that just has no clear evidence that it matters. Is anyone going to more Chicago Fire games because they rebranded? Or Houston? This league should stop doing this -- if their brands constantly need refreshing, then they're not doing a good enough job making their brand mean something.
I just don't understand why all these teams feel the need to rebrand in MLS. It's a pretty unique thing to MLS in this country, too -- you never see teams in the big-4 sports rebranding. Changing a logo? Sure, occasionally. New jerseys all the time, too. But a complete rebrand? Aside from the Redskins and Indians, it just doesn't happen.
This idea that "Well if we just change our team name, the fans will come" seems pretty farcical. It's executives who need to justify their paycheck, and they do it by coming up with stuff like this that just has no clear evidence that it matters. Is anyone going to more Chicago Fire games because they rebranded? Or Houston? This league should stop doing this -- if their brands constantly need refreshing, then they're not doing a good enough job making their brand mean something.
Many of those old name changes had to do with changes in location or affiliation. Man U's original name was based on a train station where most of the club members worked. When they grew out of that, and also in connection with new investors, they changed the name to a more city-wide designation. You see a lot of English teams named after neighborhoods or churches or workplaces that then expanded and changed their name for that reason.The one thing I'll say about the whole 'teams don't rebrand' thing is that, at the beginning of soccer in general, a lot of teams had name changes early on. We can't forget that MLS is only about 20 years old, it's pretty young. That doesn't mean name changes are a given, but it also doesn't mean that it's not going to happen. Take these for example:
View attachment 11195
10 years later
View attachment 11196
Twice in 14 years.
View attachment 11197
You get the point.
To argue against my OWN point, though, is that a lot of other teams never changed their names at all - looking at most German teams, Spanish teams, etc.
Though the trend is towards FC, they seem perfectly happy to straddle the FC/SC line. The one nod to tradition in the Crew rebrand is SC. Nashville entered pretty recently as an SC, as did Orlando in 2015. I don't expect the league to change. Any league name with Football just creates confusion with American football, which has a strong priority on the term in this country. Also MLF just invites tasteless jokes.The irony of an American football league with "soccer" within its official league name but has most of its members employ euro-style team monikers.
At this point, they should rebrand the league name as well.
I was being sarcastic with a league name change.Though the trend is towards FC, they seem perfectly happy to straddle the FC/SC line. The one nod to tradition in the Crew rebrand is SC. Nashville entered pretty recently as an SC, as did Orlando in 2015. I don't expect the league to change. Any league name with Football just creates confusion with American football, which has a strong priority on the term in this country. Also MLF just invites tasteless jokes.
I kind of guessed, but I've seen it suggested seriously.I was being sarcastic with a league name change.
I find it silly that we as a league embrace the soccer moniker, but not with its team names. We are an American league. Just embrace it, however good or bad it may be.