Mix Gone?

Dude, what is your deal? Guzan is the only mildly reasonable suggestion. Couple that with your dickish reply and limited history here, and I am asking questions.
No deal. Sorry you find my opinion dickish. I honestly don't think Guzan will leave Europe. I could be wrong. I would rather see any of those three younger and promising US team players join NYCFC. The likelihood of that happening is obviously very small.

I am new to the thread. Haven't posted a lot. Don't think my opinion should be less valuable because of it.
 
Guzan was at the Chicago White Sox game on Tuesday throwing out the first pitch. He's from the Chicago area as well. I'd be happy for Fire to bring him home and deal Sean Johnson to us, maybe factor Mix into the deal as well?

http://m.mlb.com/cws/video/topic/47150548/v900042383/usmnt-goalkeeper-brad-guzan-throws-first-pitch
I just figured with Lampson and Johnson on the roster, there would be no interest in Guzan. I never knew he was from Chicago, so that more than likely would change things if he decided he wanted to come home. Then again, if the Fire did sign him, that would free up a GK.

I also didn't think there would be interest from Philly, since they have Blake & McCarthy. Then again, the Union have a history of collecting GK's, so who knows what would happen there?

Probably all moot. Saw that someone in the Premiere League (Middlesbrough?) was interested.
 
Tom - he's played well though for us this year. No coincidence that our recent run of form has involved him
I really think Iraola has made the bigger impact on our general style of play. He's helped as a second goalscorer, no doubt, but I think the Lampard to Mix downgrade (if it ever happened) is smaller than the Iraola to Bravo downgrade in terms of keeping our style of play.
 
No deal. Sorry you find my opinion dickish. I honestly don't think Guzan will leave Europe. I could be wrong. I would rather see any of those three younger and promising US team players join NYCFC. The likelihood of that happening is obviously very small.

I am new to the thread. Haven't posted a lot. Don't think my opinion should be less valuable because of it.
I didn't find that comment dickish, unless he was referring to another comment that you made, but even so you've only made 74 comments as far as I can see, so a 1:73 ratio of dickish to dickless (?) is a massive improvment over him. In 3700+ comments he's made I'm sure he has made at least 50+ dickish comments, of which his reply to you was one.
I don't know if its his shtick to come off as abrasive and he is actually a lovable softie to those who know him but I find him to be one of the (few!) forum's bullies at times, regardless if he is (or isn't) correct. You carry on commenting in the vein you have and don't let an elitist jerk shut you down, its not your fault you found these forums later then he did.
 
Last edited:
shotsfired.gif
 
GA lasts 4 years. It's a 2 year contract with 2 more 1 year options. PS, that would mean this is Mikey Lopez's last year as a GA.
Where are the options held? With the player or with the team? Are we certain Mikey is still considered a GA?
 
Where are the options held? With the player or with the team? Are we certain Mikey is still considered a GA?

I have no idea, but it's not listed that he "graduated" Here's the article I found to explain it with a few choice quotes taken out for you.

http://ussoccerplayers.com/2010/01/mccabe-explains-generation-adidas.html

If a player gets a GA contract, is he more or less “in” MLS for four years regardless of his performance?

No. Sometimes after two or three years they’re let go – but it really does depend on whether they’ve been given a real chance and have had a chance to succeed on a team. In some places, players just don’t get an opportunity, so they may have to be traded to give them another chance to play. MLS wants to ensure that players have an opportunity. Mistakes are made, however, and sometimes it is in the player’s best interest to seek employment outside the league.

If it’s a four-year contract, how can it be rescinded within four years?

It’s not necessarily a four-year contract. In some cases, players may sign a four-year contract but it’s often two guaranteed years plus two option years. Or, it’s three guaranteed years plus two option years, so it may turn out to be five-year deal. Each contract is different and there is no set contract for each player.

Who determines when they graduate?

Usually the player himself will determine that, based on how much he plays. If he turns into a regular starter by the end of his first year, more than likely he’s going to graduate. In some cases he may not, but once you’re established in your team, then you’re more than likely going to graduate.

Contractually and financially, what exactly does that mean – to graduate?

It means that you’re applying to the team’s salary cap and the team’s senior roster numbers. You no longer have protected status.
 
Where are the options held? With the player or with the team? Are we certain Mikey is still considered a GA?

Also, it's pretty insignificant if Mikey is considered a GA or not this year. His salary is so low, that it doesn't even make our top 20 to count vs the cap. And I don't think CFG gives a damn if they pay his $50k or adidas, they can pull it out of the petty cash drawer if they have to. And by next year his GA contract is probably over and depending on moves we make, he might need to ear $80k-$90k+ to count vs our cap, which if he has the same role on this team, he deserves.
 
You don't lose them either.


We play 34 games. 34 draws result in 34 points. 34 points, historically, miss the playoffs.

I agree with Iraola's impact. I think he has been more important than Pirlo. Lampard has drawn defenses away from Villa's runs because they have to also worry about Lampard's late runs. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a changing of the guard soon where there is a focus on Lampard coming through the box that allows T-Mac or Villa more opportunities closer to goal.
 
We play 34 games. 34 draws result in 34 points. 34 points, historically, miss the playoffs.

I agree with Iraola's impact. I think he has been more important than Pirlo. Lampard has drawn defenses away from Villa's runs because they have to also worry about Lampard's late runs. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a changing of the guard soon where there is a focus on Lampard coming through the box that allows T-Mac or Villa more opportunities closer to goal.
Haha that is not what you originally wrote that I was commenting on. I fully realize 34pts won't win a playoff spot, but your initial statement was that 0-0 score doesn't win games and I provided the counterpoint that it doesn't lose them either. You were then talking about a 1-off game and now framing it within the season.
 
Haha that is not what you originally wrote that I was commenting on. I fully realize 34pts won't win a playoff spot, but your initial statement was that 0-0 score doesn't win games and I provided the counterpoint that it doesn't lose them either. You were then talking about a 1-off game and now framing it within the season.

No. My point is that you also need goals others. Aside from Villa, this franchise has been devoid of goalscorers. The second lead goalscorer in franchise history is Patrick Mullins at 6.

Iraola has been a revelation. But Lampard has made this team a winner.
 
No. My point is that you also need goals others. Aside from Villa, this franchise has been devoid of goalscorers. The second lead goalscorer in franchise history is Patrick Mullins at 6.

Iraola has been a revelation. But Lampard has made this team a winner.
Welp..... Jack may have also had a hand in it....
 
No. My point is that you also need goals others. Aside from Villa, this franchise has been devoid of goalscorers. The second lead goalscorer in franchise history is Patrick Mullins at 6.

Iraola has been a revelation. But Lampard has made this team a winner.
In addition to Mullins with 6, Lampard has 6 now as does McNamara. Poku had 7 in all competitions. Mix has 4 goals. El Capitán is currently on 30 -- club legend.
 
I didn't find that comment dickish, unless he was referring to another comment that you made, but even so you've only made 74 comments as far as I can see, so a 1:73 ratio of dickish to dickless (?) is a massive improvment over him. In 3700+ comments he's made I'm sure he has made at least 50+ dickish comments, of which his reply to you was one.
I don't know if its his shtick to come off as abrasive and he is actually a lovable softie to those who know him but I find him to be one of the (few!) forum's bullies at times, regardless if he is (or isn't) correct. You carry on commenting in the vein you have and don't let an elitist jerk shut you down, its not your fault you found these forums later then he did.
He wasn't being a dick to me. I just thought he posted some driveby semi-inflammatory stuff given the context.

If he wants to be a dick before incorporating himself into the community, then he should expect some light hazing.

And dude, you should tag someone if you want to talk shit. Otherwise, it makes you seem like a real dick.

I swear. It's like some of you have never been on a forum before. All this shit is like interwebz 101.
 
No deal. Sorry you find my opinion dickish. I honestly don't think Guzan will leave Europe. I could be wrong. I would rather see any of those three younger and promising US team players join NYCFC. The likelihood of that happening is obviously very small.

I am new to the thread. Haven't posted a lot. Don't think my opinion should be less valuable because of it.
See above. It's a forum. Everything is related to site specific tenure.

As an example, I busted dark knight 's balls here. I wouldn't at BS.

Anyway, I'm bored with this shit, and you seemingly aren't just trolling, so enjoy.
 
Back
Top