I really don't get your point, especially in the first half of your post. The Union played a single playoff game without almost all of their starters and lost. What are we aspiring to in this scenario? That they made us sweat about it because it was close? You do realize that in our current 10-game skid since Cushing won 4 in a row, the total Goal Differential is just -8. We drew twice. We lost a lot of games by 1 goal. We lost by more than 1 goal only twice and by more than 2 just once. If losing a close game when undermanned is the benchmark we are damn well nailing it.
Plus, the 2021 Union were a bunker and counter team and they played a more extreme version of that in the conference final. That approach is designed to keep games close so lower talent teams have a chance to get lucky, and even when they don't it reduces the number of blowouts. Except for the Chicago game, we haven't been doing that. If we did we might have kept the New England game to 0-1. That would not make anyone happy.
Then in the second half of your post you ask whether if NYCFC had Taty would they then be the best team in the league. Seriously? No, they're not, and again I'm not sure what point that makes. They just started 3 players from the starting 11 of the MLS Cup game and 1 good scoring forward is supposed to make that best in the league? They were pretty close to best after 13 games with 2.0 PPG and a +15 GD, or after 21 games and 1.92 PPG and +20 GD. Even now after this run of player absences they have the 4th best GD in the league overall, so yes, I'd say at full strength this is one of the best teams in the league and the absences are killing us. Also, if you think the MLS Cup lineup comparison is unfair because that was last year, well the lineup against Charlotte had just 3 starters in common with the lineup against Minnesota in Ronny's last game before he left.
Let's just consider Alfredo Morales. Last year when he was facing heavy criticism and even calls to buy out his contract (and absurdly ignorant claims that we always lost when he played) I pointed out that we were much better with him than without. In fact,
he had the biggest positive effect on the entire team when you measure PPG when he played 45' or more against when he did not. Alfredo Morales! Even I didn't did not expect that big of an effect until I looked it up. But in a capped league missing any quality starting player has an effect. It was not a fluke: in 2022, NYCFC gets 1.62 PPG when Morales plays 45 minutes and 1.20 when he does not. We weren't very good when he was hurt last year or this year. Yet just as last year, people try to blame this on anything but the obvious. Updated:
View attachment 12247
Vuk Latinovich has played 11.6x as many minutes in the last 4 games as he did in the first 27.
Our fanbase:
View attachment 12246