honda to nycfc in jan?:http://www.webcalcio.net/calciomercato-milan-fatta-unaltra-cessione-44984/
I've no idea about practice in the rest of the world. In most of the US these clauses are enforceable if reasonably limited in time and scope. So contracting with a regional sales rep that he cannot break his contract to work for a competitor in the same industry in the same region for 1-3 years after he leaves is the kind of thing that is OK. The Bravo thing I made up would probably be OK or not depending on the union CBA.This sounds a bit like a non-compete clause type of situation. It was my impression that those are being challenged more successfully lately, since it inhibits where someone can work even when they are out of contract with the original party. Is that correct? Are non-compete clauses common in the rest of the world?
#notalawyer
honda to nycfc in jan?:http://www.webcalcio.net/calciomercato-milan-fatta-unaltra-cessione-44984/
This is at the top of my list (of reasonable options). I would be so pumped. Work horse, nimble, creative, versatile, free-kick master, marketing, etc. And joined by Kagawa next season!honda to nycfc in jan?:http://www.webcalcio.net/calciomercato-milan-fatta-unaltra-cessione-44984/
Could this be what Crooks was going on about? Although he did say it was about the first position that comes to mind as a strong need, which I think most of us would say is CDM, which Honda is not. In any event, the google translation of that article was fun.
Honda would likely be a DP, Crooks said he was talking about a solid non DP signing.Could this be what Crooks was going on about? Although he did say it was about the first position that comes to mind as a strong need, which I think most of us would say is CDM, which Honda is not. In any event, the google translation of that article was fun.
He also said he wasn't talking about a DP so I doubt it.
Honda would likely be a DP, Crooks said he was talking about a solid non DP signing.
You're right, my bad. I wish he would stop teasing us like this.
Even better if Crooks is talking about a player who would make a Pirlo plus Honda formation work.You're right, my bad. I wish he would stop teasing us like this.
Yep. I'm trying to figure out what exactly could be the 1% he's so worried about - 99% are odds that anybody would take if given the opportunity to take a risk.Yeah I agree, not a fan of how he's handled whatever "news" he thinks he has. If as he said he's only 99% sure and unwilling to share until he's 100% sure, why say anything at all.
Crooks doesn't have all the scoops. Honda could be something he doesn't know aboutHonda would likely be a DP, Crooks said he was talking about a solid non DP signing.
This is how social media works.Yeah I agree, not a fan of how he's handled whatever "news" he thinks he has. If as he said he's only 99% sure and unwilling to share until he's 100% sure, why say anything at all.
honda to nycfc in jan?:http://www.webcalcio.net/calciomercato-milan-fatta-unaltra-cessione-44984/
Honda to MLS is a yearly rumor that always hits a dead end. He is not a total position of need, but I like him as a player enough to say yes. Definite upgrade to anything we have in an attacking/creating role. We have had our build up play sputter between Pirlo and Villa too much last year. He would be a nice spoke on that wheel. He'd elevate the younger players too. You'd have to really consider him as a DP if available and you'd have to sign him. Kind of like drafting by either position of need or BPA. Depends on what kind of club management sees us as in 2017.
Midfield is our only real position of need. We lost two starters.