You realize Patrick Vieira has already decided that the 4-3-3 (that can morph in to a 3-4-3) is the optimal formation, right? Or have you not paid any attention to the team's preseason & first game prior to your post?
Complain much? I actually answered his question as to the formation, as opposed to your obnoxious use of an adverb to describe my response. There's already an entire thread discussing formation and players. Starting a new thread that's redundant to another, and can also conveniently be answered by the other, is the same as asking a question that can easily be answered with a Google search. It's just plain laziness. If a newbie took the time to register in order to post, then they also should've taken the time to read some of the previous threads.
Sorry if my post was harsh. Welcome, we love to have more people discussing the team!
Describing my post as a "dick move" is an adverb.Missing a similar thread in another forum is one thing, but chiding a newbie for not doing his homework gives the wrong impression imo. I get that we want informed posts, from first-timers and regulars alike, but I just think there's a nicer way to encourage it than asking "Did you even WATCH the ING Academy stream against HB Koge?"
Also, "catty" isn't an adverb....
Welcome to the site. You should check out the formation thread. If you ignore the antics of a couple people this is quite a welcoming and nice community.
No worries - coffee is probably needed by both of us. We're good.
My post was more about having some hypothetical (ideal) fun. Vieira is going to play what he knows, which is 4-3-3, and I don't think anything that's discussed here is going to change that, though it is amusing to imagine PV scouring the forums for tactical advice.
You guys are a serious lot
Now, if I was supposed to comment elsewhere in the forum, then that's my fault, but if you try browsing or searching for threads on "formations," the site's taxonomy & navigation aren't particularly helpful.
OK, so to please the formation gods (hahahahaha), I will now give my 3-4-3 formation (as I don't think sticking Pirlo by himself in the middle works):
Col Saunders
White - Mena - Mattarita
Poku - Pirlo - Bravo - TommyMac
Villa - Mullins - Shelton
Let's the flames continue!!!
After the formations and selections we endured last year, we are all touchy about these types of threads. Tonight I will be happy with anything that doesn't include HernandezYou guys are a serious lot
Now, if I was supposed to comment elsewhere in the forum, then that's my fault, but if you try browsing or searching for threads on "formations," the site's taxonomy & navigation aren't particularly helpful.
OK, so to please the formation gods (hahahahaha), I will now give my 3-4-3 formation (as I don't think sticking Pirlo by himself in the middle works):
Col Saunders
White - Mena - Mattarita
Poku - Pirlo - Bravo - TommyMac
Villa - Mullins - Shelton
Let's the flames continue!!!
