You're right that diverse views are good. But allowing rampant, monotonous, baseless contrarianism actually has the opposite effect in that it drives away folks interested in engaging in actual discussion. I don't see much of a reason
NYCFC_Dan and this forum should host those advocating violent supporter behavior or at least attempting to chill or chide voices that speak out and oppose it.
As for what intent there could be, I don't impute an intent to injure or dox or whatever. But I don't even see that as necessary to find flaw here. I certainly think the evidence points to harassment being well within the bounds of likely outcomes, so even if not explicitly intended, it should be anticipated.
If seeking a conversation only on the merits, why not seek it here?