Stadium Discussion

What Will Be The Name Of The New Home?

  • Etihad Stadium

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • Etihad Park

    Votes: 11 47.8%
  • Etihad Field

    Votes: 7 30.4%
  • Etihad Arena

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Etihad Bowl

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    23
Can you translate for people like me who don't understand what it means?

Kind of like Star Wars when the Republic voted to activate the clones to fight the trade federation. Bloomberg created a Park Alliance to negotiate with the private parties (CFG, USTA, Mets, Related/Sterling Equities) with regards to use of the park. However, when DiBlasio was elected he played the part of Emperor Palpetine and used the alliance for evil. He gave charge to only one councilwoman who was loyal to him and she made deals where the private parties she chose would pay half the money they gave for park land towards conserving the park and half directly to the alliance (all money should really go into the general fund for the city). One of the councilman from Hillcrest is suing because he was not loyal to Emperor DiBlasio and therefore not given any say in the alliance or where it's money went, contrary to the way the actual law is written. Let's just call him a rebel ;)
 
Kind of like Star Wars when the Republic voted to activate the clones to fight the trade federation. Bloomberg created a Park Alliance to negotiate with the private parties (CFG, USTA, Mets, Related/Sterling Equities) with regards to use of the park. However, when DiBlasio was elected he played the part of Emperor Palpetine and used the alliance for evil. He gave charge to only one councilwoman who was loyal to him and she made deals where the private parties she chose would pay half the money they gave for park land towards conserving the park and half directly to the alliance (all money should really go into the general fund for the city). One of the councilman from Hillcrest is suing because he was not loyal to Emperor DiBlasio and therefore not given any say in the alliance or where it's money went, contrary to the way the actual law is written. Let's just call him a rebel ;)
:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
Kind of like Star Wars when the Republic voted to activate the clones to fight the trade federation. Bloomberg created a Park Alliance to negotiate with the private parties (CFG, USTA, Mets, Related/Sterling Equities) with regards to use of the park. However, when DiBlasio was elected he played the part of Emperor Palpetine and used the alliance for evil. He gave charge to only one councilwoman who was loyal to him and she made deals where the private parties she chose would pay half the money they gave for park land towards conserving the park and half directly to the alliance (all money should really go into the general fund for the city). One of the councilman from Hillcrest is suing because he was not loyal to Emperor DiBlasio and therefore not given any say in the alliance or where it's money went, contrary to the way the actual law is written. Let's just call him a rebel ;)

Can someone translate to GOT please?
 
Kind of like Star Wars when the Republic voted to activate the clones to fight the trade federation. Bloomberg created a Park Alliance to negotiate with the private parties (CFG, USTA, Mets, Related/Sterling Equities) with regards to use of the park. However, when DiBlasio was elected he played the part of Emperor Palpetine and used the alliance for evil. He gave charge to only one councilwoman who was loyal to him and she made deals where the private parties she chose would pay half the money they gave for park land towards conserving the park and half directly to the alliance (all money should really go into the general fund for the city). One of the councilman from Hillcrest is suing because he was not loyal to Emperor DiBlasio and therefore not given any say in the alliance or where it's money went, contrary to the way the actual law is written. Let's just call him a rebel ;)
Identity revealed:
image.jpg
 
If that cagey pre-season survey is anything to consider, would any of you be interested in the standing only seats?

Suppose the supporter section now is already standing only.
 
If that cagey pre-season survey is anything to consider, would any of you be interested in the standing only seats?

Suppose the supporter section now is already standing only.
Standing only seats are actually a safe-standing zone with a railing between rows so that the masses cannot turn into a crushing incident.

Currently the SG section does all stand but it's not mandatory.
 
Standing only seats are actually a safe-standing zone with a railing between rows so that the masses cannot turn into a crushing incident.

Currently the SG section does all stand but it's not mandatory.
I would hope at least those seats would be considerably cheaper.

I really hope it's not in Staten Island.
 
Standing only seats are actually a safe-standing zone with a railing between rows so that the masses cannot turn into a crushing incident.

Currently the SG section does all stand but it's not mandatory.
It is if you want to see anything.
 
At least we get to use most of the available field area at Yankee Stadium, could be worse, huh?

narrow-field-620x400.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert