Stadium Discussion

What Will Be The Name Of The New Home?

  • Etihad Stadium

    Votes: 4 16.7%
  • Etihad Park

    Votes: 11 45.8%
  • Etihad Field

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Etihad Arena

    Votes: 1 4.2%
  • Etihad Bowl

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24
Jon Patricof is a liar

giphy.gif


I hope there's a story behind this.
 
She’s a beut. But they stuck her in the wrong spot.

View attachment 8516

I can’t realy tell exactly where this is in the South Bronx. I’ve been going up and down the area on google maps along the river.

I’m not engineer or architect, but it looks like it would be really difficult to expand in this spot.

Also... that roof is brutal. From what we’ve seen on other “legitimate” renderings they would have Etihad plastered all over that bad boy which this doesn’t.

Overall, I can’t see this being legit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
I can’t realy tell exactly where this is in the South Bronx. I’ve been going up and down the area on google maps along the river.

I’m not engineer or architect, but it looks like it would be really difficult to expand in this spot.

Also... that roof is brutal. From what we’ve seen on other “legitimate” renderings they would have Etihad plastered all over that bad boy which this doesn’t.

Overall, I can’t see this being legit.

They put it over the Harlem River Terminal. Only subway is the 6 to access.

Tried to attach a photo, but not working
 
Well, we know that they have given that site serious thought in the past, so that could be a legitimate (if surprisingly sloppy) rending. One interesting thing that happened recently, however, is that the City Clerk's lobbyist database finally started putting the forms filed up on the website, and it sheds a lot more light on what they've been up to. Here's their form for 2017, for example. No mention of talking to the Bronx BP's office, so I'm skeptical that they're still really looking at that for the site - but a number of conversations with Melinda Katz apparently took place...
 
Well, we know that they have given that site serious thought in the past, so that could be a legitimate (if surprisingly sloppy) rending. One interesting thing that happened recently, however, is that the City Clerk's lobbyist database finally started putting the forms filed up on the website, and it sheds a lot more light on what they've been up to. Here's their form for 2017, for example. No mention of talking to the Bronx BP's office, so I'm skeptical that they're still really looking at that for the site - but a number of conversations with Melinda Katz apparently took place...
Yeah, that rendering mashup is not good. Great stadium rendering that unfortunately isn’t at the right perspective and the scale is out of proportion.

To address LionNYC LionNYC ’s comment, it may be fabric, but not likely, as that wouldn’t provide protection from rain and would be a hell of a problem under a snow load. More likely a plastic/acrylic composite to let light in and offer impervious protection.

What’s very interesting is that this appears to have three levels of pedestrian promenades which could include commercial spaces to activate the areas along the water (restaurants, bars, shops). That would be a prime selling point towards rejuvenating the area in return for the stadium.
 
Over two years he has fed people absolute bullshit. And his lies are now starting to contradict themselves.

Believe nothing he says or you will get burned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ferrarinycfc
Yeah, that rendering mashup is not good. Great stadium rendering that unfortunately isn’t at the right perspective and the scale is out of proportion.

To address LionNYC LionNYC ’s comment, it may be fabric, but not likely, as that wouldn’t provide protection from rain and would be a hell of a problem under a snow load. More likely a plastic/acrylic composite to let light in and offer impervious protection.

What’s very interesting is that this appears to have three levels of pedestrian promenades which could include commercial spaces to activate the areas along the water (restaurants, bars, shops). That would be a prime selling point towards rejuvenating the area in return for the stadium.

Doesn’t seem real to me either. And would also be super disappointing based on the rendering formula:

Gorgeous rendering - 30% of the budget it would take to make it = actual final product.

It’s just not pretty, nor impressive enough that I’d be satisfied with a lesser version of it.
 
Doesn’t seem real to me either. And would also be super disappointing based on the rendering formula:

Gorgeous rendering - 30% of the budget it would take to make it = actual final product.

It’s just not pretty, nor impressive enough that I’d be satisfied with a lesser version of it.

Let's be honest. Only renderings with Etihad Stadium branding are legitimate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twsj91
Over two years he has fed people absolute bullshit. And his lies are now starting to contradict themselves.

Believe nothing he says or you will get burned.
I’m not dismissing what you’re saying, but can you give some details (recent vs past) that have all of a sudden sent you to the deepest reaches of distrust???
 
Let's be honest. Only renderings with Etihad Stadium branding are legitimate.
They're not going to put Etihad on it until they are ready to announce that Etihad is the sponsor.
Just because everyone knows Etihad will be the sponsor does not mean they are ready to announce it.
They will be ready to announce it -- at the earliest -- when they announce the location.
Therefore until then no official renderings should have Etihad on it.
 
I’m not dismissing what you’re saying, but can you give some details (recent vs past) that have all of a sudden sent you to the deepest reaches of distrust???


I'll give the one that put me over the top this week. In the past 10 months, he's provided 3 different answers regarding the size of the stadium. All lies.

He tells you what you want to hear to keep you paying the bills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ferrarinycfc
I'll give the one that put me over the top this week. In the past 10 months, he's provided 3 different answers regarding the size of the stadium. All lies.

He tells you what you want to hear to keep you paying the bills.
What did you hear this week? I was at a round table discussion two weeks ago and pressed him on it and he said 26k with the likelihood of expansion. He knows people want 40k now, but until the STH go up, there’d be open seats which would hurt resale.
 
I'll give the one that put me over the top this week. In the past 10 months, he's provided 3 different answers regarding the size of the stadium. All lies.

He tells you what you want to hear to keep you paying the bills.

Kjbert my guy, we need stadium first .....THEN we can complain of the sizes.