And they removed the video...the welcome interview that some wanted to see
And they removed the video...
This was my takeaway. There's a big difference between CFG approving player moves and CFG dictating player moves.Assuming what Todd meant in the best light that the club is not telling him who to sign but is greenlighting moves. I imagine this is SOP at most professional sports teams for ownership to be somewhat involved in greenlighting major personnel moves especially for big money.
Does give an interesting opportunity to ask Brad who is involved in this case.
Did they really need to crank the AI slop music to 10 behind his monotone? I couldn't keep attention because it was so distracting and dull.
Next post will feature selective color.Digital media team really wants us to know about their industry typical skills. Earlier in camp they made a whole post to show that the photography team knows how to use photoshop:
![]()
I noticed he said that also. My guess is it's just him being a non-naive English speaker using a term he's familiar with to mean "management."This was my takeaway. There's a big difference between CFG approving player moves and CFG dictating player moves.
Pascal said he "went to the board" to ask for a No. 9 and some other things. My question is, which board?
Do we even have a board of our own anymore? If we do, I assume it's Brad, Marty, Marcelo Claure, someone from the Yankees (), that kind of thing.
But if we don't, Marty Edelman is the only NYCFC official listed on CFG's board now. Brad used to be on there, but he's not now.
The answer to that question — which board? — would tell me a lot about where we truly are. Does anyone know?
I'll give them credit for these pics, though. A big improvement over the usual.Digital media team really wants us to know about their industry typical skills. Earlier in camp they made a whole post to show that the photography team knows how to use photoshop:
![]()
Non-native? hahaI noticed he said that also. My guess is it's just him being a non-naive English speaker using a term he's familiar with to mean "management."
Or maybe we have a board.
Or, non-naive enough not to fall for the "there is no board" conspiracy.Non-native? haha
The atmosphere just feels different. More sporting endeavor, less a cog in a corporate machine.SoupInNYC posted this in the other forum and while its sad news I thought it was worth noting here that Dunivan is providing quotes to the press. Can't recall ever seeing a quote like this from Lee, seems like a positive sign that there is a differences between them when it comes to communicating.
The atmosphere just feels different. More sporting endeavor, less a cog in a corporate machine.
Understandable. I tend to go the opposite way: I don't want to just bring somebody in simply to do something. Whoever it is, he needs to be compatible with Alonso (we have to assume Martinez will come back and be the same guy unless and until actually game play proves otherwise) and fit the age profile we're working.Eh, I'll give him a win on the communication but to me the true test if this is a different era is getting a striker this window. I don't want to hear we had to wait for the right guy, every other team in the league gets their business done on time there are plenty of quality players up for grabs they have no excuse for not getting it done.
Unfortunately, I don't agree with this:But the fact we had one on the rails just three weeks after Dunivant officially started is a good sign in my book
I think the responsible move is to assume he doesn't come back anywhere near his prior ability. If he does, great. But I think you have to plan for an injury like that to take a step away from the player.we have to assume Martinez will come back and be the same guy unless and until actually game play proves otherwise
I agree with this:
Unfortunately, I don't agree with this:
I think the responsible move is to assume he doesn't come back anywhere near his prior ability. If he does, great. But I think you have to plan for an injury like that to take a step away from the player.
Perfectly reasonable point of view, and I agree with it to a certain extent. I thought signing Sylla to a DP contract was absolutely the right move, with the shadow understanding Alonso would get his money too should he come back at the same level he was at before.I agree with this:
Unfortunately, I don't agree with this:
I think the responsible move is to assume he doesn't come back anywhere near his prior ability. If he does, great. But I think you have to plan for an injury like that to take a step away from the player.
I would say third window rather than second. But I get it, we're all anxious to get that last piece of the puzzle in place. We almost had it. Now we have to wonder again if we're going to get trapped in CFG's black box bureaucracy or whether we control our own destiny.If it drags out into the second window I think we have evidence that our sluggish player acquisitions are a CFG issue and it doesn't really matter who the SD is.