After the goal celebration, Callens alone walks with Taty. Take a look at the numbers.
17! Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.
Coincidence? I don’t think so. Smarten up people.
MLS - April 24 - Cincinnati (Home)
- Thread starter LionNYC
- Start date
17! Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.
Coincidence? I don’t think so. Smarten up people.
NYCFC is the intersection of Q-Anon and Blue-Anon. It all makes sense now.
Separately, it also explains why Shradi didn't get there fast enough. He was being held back slightly by the other guy and it puts him back like half a second
that proves nothing except that have invested way too much time into this.
Proves he kicked it not at the goal.
Also work's been a tad slow recently soooo ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I think these are doctored. I don't see Umbrella Man.
i don't think anybody disputed that he did NOT kick it at the goal. we could all see the ball's trajectory. the question is whether his INTENT was to kick it at goal, goofed, and got lucky or if he INTENDED to get the deflection or cross it to isi. that obviously cannot be proven with your images.
You've described my social life with regards to NYCFC over the past 6 years.
Why not? You can see the direction he moves his foot. You can see where he is looking the entire time. If he was trying to hit towards goal, there would be something from his body language or movements at all telling us so. However there is 0 of that. Even in the slow mo (and they show a front and back slow mo) I just can't see it possible that it was not on purpose
what i see is his foot slices the ball. which could be his attempt to curl it with the outside of his foot into the far corner. but goofed, it went straighter than he had planned, but luckily it deflected and went in anyway.
the only guarantee here is there is no guarantee that you are right and i am wrong without taty telling us exactly what he intended (and is honest about it)
I think we all need to adopt this response site-wide. Would just make things easier, ya know?
I think most of us already adopt this response site-wide, we just don't outright say it
yes. the camera guy asks him at the 1 minute spot "how does it feel Vuk?"
I heard it, but it wasn't clear to me, and he has facial hair in most photos and I wasn't sure it's the same guy. Thx.
The only justification I can come up with for crediting Taty with that goal is that nobody wanted to embarrass Hagglund by attaching two OGs to him in the same match.
It was incredibly obvious in real time that it was an OG, and the replays make it even more clear.
It was incredibly obvious in real time that it was an OG, and the replays make it even more clear.
