CFG usually goes for an 80/20 partnership. So 80% CFG and 20% DV7.
I think CFG understands the US soccer market that Queensboro FC would market better than NYCFC II. I don't think NYCFC fans would care if the name is or isn't NYCFC II, but there are likely some percentage of fans that wouldn't support a team directly named NYCFC II but want an independently named team.
Oof, I would be so disappointed if CFG owned the sole USL team in NYC as well.
Not to mention, its not very clear to me why CFG would be "hiding" their involvement in a USL team behind Villa. If they managed to make their brand so toxic in this city already that they have to pretend they aren't involved, things aren't looking good for the franchise.