I would post this in the Houston post-match thread but wouldn't wanna distract from the JLew guessing game for actual football.
I think that PV is trying to have us play a 4-5-1 or 4-4-2 in D which transitions to the 3-4-2-1 in attack, which is why we saw Jack and Maxi so narrow in attack. Ideally this means Jack comes inside, Ring hangs and the full backs get up the pitch very quickly. But it's a discombobulating set of transitions compared to the way a 4-3-3 transitions from D to attack (basically the wide players move forward and that's it). I think we are still getting the hang of this, which is why Houston were so effective at bunkering against us.
I may be wrong - I was pretty sloshed on Saturday and I haven't watched a replay yet.
I think it can work if:
- ... we can move the ball forward to Villa / Harrison / Maxi more quickly
- Ring can really own that front sweeper role and push Brillant and Callens wider so that
- Struna and Sweat can stay high.
I understand why people would rather see us lock down 2nd spot with the 4-3-3, but I think PV is aware of the limitations of being undermanned in midfield, especially against the 3 ATB systems of teams like RBNJ and Toronto, and is trying to get us drilled and ready to play what is essentially a 6 man midfield. It's a ballsy move this late in the season, but I think his philosophy is that if we can't win MLS Cup it doesn't matter where we finish or what round we go out in. I partially agree because I don't think that there is a ton of advantage to playing second legs at home, or even to avoiding the first round play-in.
Am I crazy?