franchise646
Registered
And that the team isn't putting a mussel on them, or it.My god, that is excellent!
I love that the guys on the team endorse this stuff.
And that the team isn't putting a mussel on them, or it.My god, that is excellent!
I love that the guys on the team endorse this stuff.
But since the announcement was made on the eve of 2015 that Lampard would extend his stay, City have had 10 games in the Premier League and Champions League. Lampard has featured in seven but for a total of just 96 minutes (20, 8, 27, 13, 10, 7 and 11), even with Toure away and injuries afflicting the midfield.
With Yaya Toure missing significant time this year for the African Cup of Nations, it was expected that Lampard's extended stay would be used to fill that place. Instead, Lampard saw most of his action as a late substitute, where he was not effective enough to fix City's poor play during that time. After City pillaged their sister club to keep him around, garnering some negative press in the process, it feels like that was all for naught and that City would have been better served to let Lampard go.
I believe it is a requirement. Similar with Gerrard. They should both appear the same week.At this point he should come over.
I am no longer concerned about him not having a break. He hasn't played enough to accumulate wear and tear.
I believe it is a requirement. Similar with Gerrard. They should both appear the same week.
MLS would get a full chub if Gerrard and Lampard debut (and both start) at NYC FC vs. LA on national television. Hell, I'd fly out to LA to see the game.
I'm sorry to disappoint you mate but people are going to be very disappointed with both Gerrard and lampard both have been fantastic players Gerrard s legs have gone and he's been causing Liverpool problems by still being at the club.they havnt known what to do with him luckily he picked up an injury and Liverpool have gone on a good run without him,he will only get his place back in sentiment not current form.MLS would get a full chub if Gerrard and Lampard debut (and both start) at NYC FC vs. LA on national television. Hell, I'd fly out to LA to see the game.
Metro: Was re-signing Frank Lampard worth it for Manchester City?
Bitter and blue: Was Keeping Frank Lampard From NYCFC Worth It For City?
I, for one, am happy to see it only took them 3 months to start catching on...
lolzRumor from NYCFC exec office... if Man City gets the boot in Champions League, Frank may come back early. He's dying to come to NY. He's not happy playing 5 minutes a game at Man City.
Not sure contractually what he can or carnt do ,but with city pretty much certainly going out of the champions league on Wednesday and in reality one more deafet away from conceding the league ,it would make sense for him to go to NY now.however if Chelsea react badly to last nights defeat and city start to reel them in I suspect he will stay put until the end of the season.it seems a strong rumour over here that Xavi will be your next DPRumor from NYCFC exec office... if Man City gets the boot in Champions League, Frank may come back early. He's dying to come to NY. He's not happy playing 5 minutes a game at Man City.
lolz
Quoted because this can't be quoted enough.......Fuck MCFC, fuck CFG and fuck Lampard.
Pelligrinijust beingis a scumbag.
I can't wait for Barca to give MCFC a nice ass-kicking next week. Fuerza Blaugrana!!!
Rumor from NYCFC exec office... if Man City gets the boot in Champions League, Frank may come back early. He's dying to come to NY. He's not happy playing 5 minutes a game at Man City.
He's dying to come??? Give me a break.