Look, Jags is my boy, but I have to think he's lost a step since the '14/'15 season.
or 6.Look, Jags is my boy, but I have to think he's lost a step since the '14/'15 season.
Maybe that’s the urinal.Who the fuck lets a can of Red Bull into the locker room? Let alone drink it?
View attachment 8396
Completely agreed on this. I rewatched the first half last night; consider my ticket punched for the Medina hype train.Agreed that Jack would have fared better with Tinner, but at the same time there's things I'm seeing that lead me to believe Medina will be better all-around.
- Jack often suffered from tunnel vision - 1v1 and step-overs all day long.
- Medina seems to be more of a team player, aware of all available options in the final 3rd.
- I don't think Jack (successfully) makes that run that led to Villa's goal.
- Medina seems to have a good defensive work rate.
- Pretty sure he made a tackle or two way over in Sweat's jurisdiction.
I think yes. And I am saying that anticipating that Jack would have continued to improve.
FWIW Jack is an $8 Million rated player and Medina is a $4 Million rated player. We k ow those numbers are BS, but the output of Medina is what I expected of Jack this year. On one hand, this makes me happy. On another, imagine both those guys on this squad.
My read on it thus far is that Medina is a more clever attacker than Jack. That might seem like a hot take just now, but I think it will hold true. Where Jack was good was running straight at his marker, that was his party piece, and it worked a treat until it didn't.Medina has replaced Harrison.
We're the same team as last year except Tinnerholm is the best RB in the league.
and the movement is excellent. He doesn't stand still or only make runs into the box. He was circling back and making over/underlapping runs that CDMs and CBs have to step toward. The result of that is more time and space for the man on the ball to pick a pass. That is key to why we looked better in final third possession and why we might actually score a few goals that aren't pure counter-attacks.Medina’s passing
What were people's thoughts on Ofori last night? I didn't really pay a whole ton of attention to him, so I may go back and watch the condensed match to get a feel for it.
One other thing from the second half last night, I remember at least 3-4 successful crosses where there was no one who made the run to the back post to dunk it in. If only there was another forward they could put on who would make that tactical run...
Blowing the Nordic horn and calling the Viking...
The only other time that we did this that comes to mind right now was in the inaugural season against Orlando. Kaka free kick off the post, Mix and Poku lead the break to put us up 5-3.Going over some key points this morning, it occurred to me that the second goal last night was the second time in 2 games that we defended an opponent's free kick straight into a breakaway chance. Last week we did it at the end of the first half, leading to that play where Vila was dispossessed on the 3-on-1. I'm not sure we did something like that more than 2-3 times all last year. I hope we keep it up.
Can anyone make sense of Vieira's answer about why he took Medina out again fairly early. It starts around 2:12. here's my attempt at a transcript. It's nonsense:
And I still don’t get people slacking on Wallace. If you don’t see why he starts, I just can’t be messageboard pals with you. The guy is just a general menace. If he could finish, he’d start for 15 PL teams.
Yeah, this was a problem after Medina came off for Ofori—nobody seemed totally sure how the four-man midfield was supposed to work. Maxi was vaguely covering the right wing in addition to his usual position but wasn't playing high enough to make those far post runs.