Thanks. I’ll try to find and change that setting.
But I agree: AppleTV tries their hardest to be a spoiler
it's at the very bottom of the account settings.
Thanks. I’ll try to find and change that setting.
But I agree: AppleTV tries their hardest to be a spoiler
This is very cool. We're second from bottom left.
I don’t think there has been anything since the pins.this is a great idea and kinda reminds me of the borough pins we got the one season. it's been awhile since i've gone to games consistently... has the club given season themed freebies like the this or the our borough pins the last couple seasons?
No question. It's the first thing I thought of.I was just coming here to post a link to the Curtin story from The Athletic.
Bet San Jose and Chicago wish they can get a do over.
Is it academy? The way I remember it, the recent core was Blake, Glesnes, Gazdag, Elliot, Martinez, Carranza, Bedoya, Wagner, all valuable guys they had gotten at a discount or at a great price. The only academy product was McGlynn, but the fanbase didn't even like him much. Aaronson they sold a while back; Sullivan only getting minutes this season, etc. Maybe more academy products than most but not 100% crucial IMHO. But I am no expert. Maybe I am misrememberingI think a string of incredible academy productions paired with savvy roster construction led to success that made Curtin look like a much better coach than he actually is. That said I think the Union's lack of spending compared to the rest of the league is starting to catch up with them and unless they are willing to increase their roster spend a different coach isn't going to make any difference. I know their academy is good but there is no way their current rate of prospect generation is sustainable and that is the main thing covering for the lack of spending.
For the "Cushing out" crowd. Would you take Curtin instead?
I would take him sure, but. . . . . . .For the "Cushing out" crowd. Would you take Curtin instead?
View attachment 13585
In 2022 the Union overperformed xGD by 22.5. It was +10 on offense and +12 on defense, a lot of that no doubt Andre Blake. But no keeper is so good that he can sustain that level year over year. But at the time, Curtin was deemed a genius.
In 2023 they exceeded xG differential by 12. Still huge but also a big drop. +5 offense and +7 defense. Curtin merely a good coach
In 2024 they exceed xGD by 7. Blake played less than half their games. Still almost +6 on offense but merely +1 on defense. Curtin fired.
They have pretty much the same core, including scorers Gazdag, Carranza and Uhre. But those guys are not Messi level and cannot overperform their xG consistently. Coaches have almost no effect on that either. The Union was not as good as appearances in 2022. They're only disappointing in 2024 compared to the unrealistic expectations of 2022.
But to be fair to the people who fired Curtin, the Union defense cratered aside from Blake. xGA went from 39 to 45 to 54. I don't know what that's about Their back line has the same people and none are very old. A defense that stays together should keep getting better absent aging issues.
View attachment 13585
In 2022 the Union overperformed xGD by 22.5. It was +10 on offense and +12 on defense, a lot of that no doubt Andre Blake. But no keeper is so good that he can sustain that level year over year. But at the time, Curtin was deemed a genius.
In 2023 they exceeded xG differential by 12. Still huge but also a big drop. +5 offense and +7 defense. Curtin merely a good coach
In 2024 they exceed xGD by 7. Blake played less than half their games. Still almost +6 on offense but merely +1 on defense. Curtin fired.
They have pretty much the same core, including scorers Gazdag, Carranza and Uhre. But those guys are not Messi level and cannot overperform their xG consistently. Coaches have almost no effect on that either. The Union was not as good as appearances in 2022. They're only disappointing in 2024 compared to the unrealistic expectations of 2022.
But to be fair to the people who fired Curtin, the Union defense cratered aside from Blake. xGA went from 39 to 45 to 54. I don't know what that's about Their back line has the same people and none are very old. A defense that stays together should keep getting better absent aging issues.
I have no data to support this hypothesis but maybe the league has shifted from a tactics and/or talent standpoint where having two big lumbering CBs like Elliot and Glesnes isn't as effective as it has been in the past.