I see that, but this issue of comparing a top-flight league in a non footballing country like the USA to a 2nd level league in a top footballing country like Germany or Spain ought to measure some intangibles that are really head-spinning to me, particularly the quality of youth development and coaching, and therefore of the academy players who participate in the 2nd level league, who may not rank as high in this kind of comparison as their true skill level would deserve. Mind you, I know nothing about this. I am just toying with the idea. But please consider this fact: the total US military personnel in Germany is about 35,000 and was as high as 200,000 during its Cold-War peak. I don't know what percentage of them marry German ladies, but it can't be 100%. So the population of German-American offspring of these soldiers has to be tiny, and they cannot all be soccer-crazy and athletic freaks. However, their prominence in the USMNT lineups has been, for many decades, absurdly outsized, Noahkai Banks being just the latest example. They should have a 1 in a million chance, but for all practical purposes strike at 1 in 10. The only reasonable explanation for that, IMHO, is that the quality of youth soccer development in Germany is just a gazillion times better than here. And don't get me started on LaMasia. So I suspect that a league with a sizable contingent of very young players who have participated in those development programs may be underrated in $ terms because those kids potential value won't be realized immediately.