yeah thats the general supporters page.
yeah thats the general supporters page.
Yes that's it but it's not TR. The only connection to TR is that BH - who is Director of Game Day Logistics st TR http://www.thirdrail.nyc/board-of-directors/ - is the mod, and when TR announced that it was closing its primary FB page, he posted in the TR FB page an invitation to come join his group. Which again, is not a TR group. It's a BH group open to anyone except them who BH decides to ban.
I think the flashpoint in all of this is the portion of Bullet 5 on the Membership Application that states, "we ask that you no longer participate in other Supporter Group functions". To me, that feels a bit divisive IF I'm interpreting it correctly.
understood. Nonetheless, it's all made for great banter. As they say, no such thing as bad publicity!One thing that should be considered, the application that was leaked wasn't meant to be a rule book for the world to see. Just a basic "this is what we're about - if you're still interested, please read on". But then the internet happened. We are currently revising and rewording a few points to resemble something more of an official SG document.
by rules i meant membership applicationpost the rules if you can
man there are already supporter rivalries and the regular season has yet to even start.
that page has actually been around for a long time, billy and I made the page like the day nycfc was announced, its grown ever since, it was never third rail page although we were thinking about it for sometime but then realized it would be a pain in the ass to keep only third rail members in there because there was already like 1500 people in there at that time so we made the third rail page and kept the nycfc supporters page as just a general group where all fans of the club can come and talk about whatever. because people knew i was on the third rail board i removed myself of as an admin on that page and now its only billyThat's the group. It just opened recently. TR announced that they were going to close their FB group when they open their forum. Then they announced they were starting this new FB group which would be "Closed" but open to anyone, not just TR members. And to be clear, "Closed" in this context means what FB says it means, only members can post or see posts. It was supposed to be open to anyone who wanted to join. But almost immediately they banned the HOO folks. I don't know everyone who runs it or if they are all TR people, but Billy Howell, who is TR, took "credit" for banning the HO people.
It's also important to note that there weren't any digs intended at Third Rail.
There's a growing trend of massive SGs with huge numbers, yet there is still an attendance issue in MLS. Our goal is to build support, through a strong foundation and grow from there.
That's what the statement about merchandise was about. If the Third Rail members take that personally, it's a shame. That has nothing to do with what we're about.
The "unaffiliated" NYCFC page that Buckley is referring to.So which page is banning HOO members then, if any?
Having watched MLS for eight years now, I can say with certainty that there is absolutely no attendance issue in MLS. An attendance issue was what Chivas USA had, only back them that was the norm rather than the exception. I am not sure how a SG that aspires to 100 members in the near term hopes to impact MLS attendance in any meaningful way. SGs really aren't made for boosting attendance, even the largest are less than a quarter of capacity.
And to harp on the merchandise line again, it really doesn't need to be there. Organizations should avoid defining themselves by what they are not rather than what they are. The merchandise bit logically refers to TR and implies that their members joined for the S.W.A.G. Which offends members, like myself, who joined to contribute to the club, build relationships and all the other SG good stuff.
Like I said earlier, I have no problem with what you guys are looking to do. I was just trying to explain why there was a shitstorm. Whether the implication was intended or not, it was there and people reacted as they did. I think you guys have done well to manage the explosion.There's actually a significant attendance issue in MLS.
But more to the point, we're building our support a little bit differently. It's a result of discussing the issues with our current membership, and deciding as a whole. Hearts of Oak acts entirely on behalf of the membership. We want to build long-lasting support.
There's no targeting of the Third Rail intended. The Third Rail has 1700 members. We can't do that. We gain nothing from implying anything toward them (or you) as fellow supporters of NYCFC.
Having said all of that, if you don't like our plan or our message, you don't have to. You're not a member. Our rules don't apply to you. There's plenty of supporters who don't like the mission of other SGs. Choices are perfectly healthy for the support of a club, especially a particularly new fan base.
We can't wait to see what 1,000+ supporters can show in the bleachers next to us.
Like I said earlier, I have no problem with what you guys are looking to do. I was just trying to explain why there was a shitstorm. Whether the implication was intended or not, it was there and people reacted as they did. I think you guys have done well to manage the explosion.
I don't disagree with choice in SGs, it's perfectly valid. I will say that my personal, likely irrational desire is for one, unified SG. Many small SGs wouldn't be able to accomplish what one big one could and the talent split into many would not reach the same potential as the talent grouped into one. But I recognize that this desire is an unreasonable one. Just a wish...