I'd settle for just having a better than mediocre one.Sure. But who do you want and at what expense? Is Dan Kennedy 130k better than Josh Saunders? Maybe. Maybe not. But this was an easy decision in my eyes. It allows us to spend more on other areas of need.
My hope, long term, is that we become a key developer of goalkeepers in the US.
Lurch and Saunders must be some charming sons of bitches. Neither are worth a damn and there are probably 100 better keepers in the US pool alone, yet both remain gainfully employed by the same single club of the 20 top division teams in this country.
And they do this without the benefit of a tunnel cam pumping out all of their inane footy platitudes, so we don't even have the Crazy Joe Hart card to play.