moogoo may not be right about the defense, but he’s had good comments on other things. He is certainly not a troll and to suggest that is not appropriate. So far, I’ve been happy he’s around.
Regarding Callens, I am in between on him. He is certainly not crap, but he is prone to bad mistakes from time to time. I think he is a solid starter for us, but not all star quality. Between he, Freddie and Maxim, I think we have what we need for starters and depth with a 2-man back line and by adding Ferraresi, we would be good for a 3-man back line.
Regarding Callens, I am in between on him. He is certainly not crap, but he is prone to bad mistakes from time to time. I think he is a solid starter for us, but not all star quality. Between he, Freddie and Maxim, I think we have what we need for starters and depth with a 2-man back line and by adding Ferraresi, we would be good for a 3-man back line.
We have a 17 year old American who started at CB in the u17 World Cup... I know vieira mentions him more as a defensive mid but he can def grow into a center back at the senior levelI’d disageee and say for the player that logged the most minutes for us this season Callens was a stabilizing force for our D.
My only concern is Callens, Chanot, Birlliant and Ferrarasi are all internationals. Having no domestic depth at the position will come back to bite us in the USOC.
All of our wingers, fullbacks (except struna), and GKs count as domestics. Sweat and White can back up CB and still put our best internationals on the USOC roster.I’d disageee and say for the player that logged the most minutes for us this season Callens was a stabilizing force for our D.
My only concern is Callens, Chanot, Birlliant and Ferrarasi are all internationals. Having no domestic depth at the position will come back to bite us in the USOC.
Ftr, I am glad to have him around, too. I don't think he's a troll.moogoo may not be right about the defense, but he’s had good comments on other things. He is certainly not a troll and to suggest that is not appropriate. So far, I’ve been happy he’s around.
I think there are a lot of people who don't hate Rodney. At the very least, a lot of people who don't think it's fair to judge him (or Jack) without a consistent overlapping full back option.Ftr, I am glad to have him around, too. I don't think he's a troll.
Some odd opinions, for sure. I have no problem with folks being wrong, so long as they don't have a problem being called out.
I expect the same applies as it relates to me. Ol' moogoo and I are like the only two people who don't hate Rodney. I guess that really annoys the folks who think we have a cartel on opinion holding.
Forgot about you.I think there are a lot of people who don't hate Rodney. At the very least, a lot of people who don't think it's fair to judge him (or Jack) without a consistent overlapping full back option.
I think he has a very important skill set, adds great depth, and tactical flexibility to our roster. He can play a bunch of different positions. 220k is a reasonable salary for someone like him even if we sign a DP winger.I think there are a lot of people who don't hate Rodney. At the very least, a lot of people who don't think it's fair to judge him (or Jack) without a consistent overlapping full back option.
Ferraressi and Brillant won't both be here I don't think.
If we go three at the back, could easily see it being Callens Chanot Brillant, with Chanot as the sweeper that has freedom to walk the ball forward. And that’d leave Sweat White and Ferraresi as the backups.Brillant is borderline at his salary, but I think I would keep him after his strong showing down the stretch. Ferraresi is just 19, he is not a sure thing by far. Having the veteran depth could be invaluable.
Agreed, unless we want to move to 3 in the back.Ferraressi and Brillant won't both be here I don't think.
Brillant is borderline at his salary, but I think I would keep him after his strong showing down the stretch. Ferraresi is just 19, he is not a sure thing by far. Having the veteran depth could be invaluable.
I don't like a slow CB as one of the wide Cbs in a 3.If we go three at the back, could easily see it being Callens Chanot Brillant, with Chanot as the sweeper that has freedom to walk the ball forward. And that’d leave Sweat White and Ferraresi as the backups.
I just don't know. It's hard for me to lobby to send away a guy who is easily starter caliber for every team except us and SKC.Brillant is borderline at his salary, but I think I would keep him after his strong showing down the stretch. Ferraresi is just 19, he is not a sure thing by far. Having the veteran depth could be invaluable.
I just don't know. It's hard for me to lobby to send away a guy who is easily starter caliber for every team except us and SKC.
(eta: to clarify, I think I'm with you. The only way I could see it making sense is if we could turn him into a starting piece elsewhere on the pitch that is an upgrade. Maybe if you could turn him into a Kellyn Rowe - who I still think would kill it playing those first time passes in to Villa - or an actual attacking option to sub/spell Villa - Agudelo maybe? Apparently I want to pick the bones of NER.)
Agudelo would be verrrrry interesting as a second forward in a 3-5-2 with Villa as the other starter up top.