In early 2024 we also had Jovan and Malachi Jones. On paper we were stacked with offensive bodies and potential. We've loaned Jovan away with no replacement, and Malachi's possible return is a complete wildcard. Even if we had a guarantee he returns with 100% recovery, with full strength and speed, we've no idea what he can contribute because he played just 488 minutes.
If they don't - at minimum - replace Jovan with someone new (preferably a bit older and established) it's a joke. I'll even be disappointed if we do that and run it back with Ojeda, Fernandez and Jones, hoping that 1 of those 3 breaks out. I think the most likely result is we ship off Ojeda or Fernandez, maybe even within MLS, but replace him with a similar player of potential.
56 points is nice but it still only left us in 5th. I'm convinced we overachieved. We can't compete at the top level with this offense. I'm going to rain on everyone's mood right now and say this year was barely better than last year.
We have 6 more points. We finished 1 spot higher in the standings. Beyond that there is no real improvement.
| 2024 | 2025 | Notes |
Points | 50 | 56 | nice jump |
Place | 6th | 5th | nice again |
What If | 3 more pts puts us in 4th | 3 more pts puts us in 4th | dead even |
GD | 5 | 6 | OK |
xGD | 3.37 | 3.33 | It's the same picture meme |
xPts | 49.08 | 48.54 | Nathan Fillion meme |
GD-xGD | +1.63 | +2.67 | a bit better |
Pts - xPts | +0.92 | +7.46 | now this is interesting |
Maybe good coaches like Jansen have an actual ability to squeeze more juice from the lemon and finish out wins?
For reference, 2024 Coach of the Year Wilfried Nancy managed achieve a Pts-xPts of +10.45. But this year it was only +2.57.
In 2016 Patrick Viera had Pts-xPts of +7.38, very close to Jansen this year. In 2017 Viera managed just +1.14.
Still, 2017 NYCFC had 3 more points than 2016, so it worked out? Yes, but really because we added Johnson, Moralez, Callens, Ring, Herrera, Wallace, and Lewis, among others. Hell, even newly acquired Ben Sweat had a +2.35 Goals Added value per ASA. Team xGD improved by more than 14 and GD improved by 8. It was arguably the biggest and most successful 1-year roster overhaul in team history and it only added 3 points because the same very good coach could not maintain the same level of over-achievement year over year.
Coaches aren't magicians. It is very hard, maybe impossible, to consistently outperform your roster or your underlying numbers year after year after year. It's also quite hard to improve your underlying numbers without a better roster. If this roster does not improve significantly, I think 56 points is a ceiling next year. I'm glad we will have a new Sporting Director because I think someone new with a distanced perspective will be better able to see this than Lee would have been. OTOH if CFG rules dictate everything how much does it matter?