The problem people have with Xavi has nothing to do with him or his age directly, I don't think. It has to do with the fact that a midfield containing Xavi, Frank Lampard, and Mix might play the prettiest game in the league but as soon as they come up against a team that packs the midfield with young, athletic players they are going to get run over.anyone bashing this move is crazy... could you find a better, younger option? possibly but i am sure theyve done their due diligence... a big key here is Xavi is another professional who will be great in creating a culture for this squad and will play right into our desired style of possession football... We will arguably play the most attractive brand in the entire league in our first year of existence... im excited... when FL and Xavi retire i have no doubts theyll be replaced by more big money signings... the commitment is there - let's just hope some of these cheaper owners budge on CBA talks and we get to enjoy our squad come Sunday.
The problem people have with Xavi has nothing to do with him or his age directly, I don't think. It has to do with the fact that a midfield containing Xavi, Frank Lampard, and Mix might play the prettiest game in the league but as soon as they come up against a team that packs the midfield with young, athletic players they are going to get run over.
IMO when we play a good team Kreis will have to drop one of them, which probably won't happen, or our weak defense is going to get absolutely no protection when teams sit back and counter us.
It's weird to say that I don't want Xavi, because ofcourse id like it if he played for us. But if I had to pick, with the options we already have, a younger more mobile midfielder would be better.
http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2015/03/04/samir-nasri-i-would-like-to-play-in-mls/
Wow would love to have him
The people that are blasting this move are short sighted. This isn't about creating an MLS Champion in day one. It's about dropping their cock on the table and saying to the rest of the league - we are here to make a statement and we will continue to blow everyone out of the water with the amount of resources we can provide to create a winner in New York City.
I agree with the things u say like 90 percent of the time, but idk man. I think we can make a statement with getting a DP in another position instead, even forward. Our midfield has the most depth, it would just seem weird to put a DP in a position where you are already the strongest.
But if I put myself in someones shoes from a marketing perspective, i guess I could kinda why. Having players everyone knows about on ur team would draw and audience and potentially more fans. But i think it could all blow up if we loose a lot. new york fan bases don't like loosing organizations…..unless you are a jets fan. jk jk..kinda
Star power over winning or losing is a pretty bad mentality to have and hopefully one CFG doesn't follow.If you have star power in New York, the city doesn't care all that much if you win or lose. Look at the Knicks. Basketball wise, they should not have re-signed Carmelo Anthony. But business wise, they had to.
Star power over winning or losing is a pretty bad mentality to have and hopefully one CFG doesn't follow.
IF we do go for xavi, the only formation that would make sense is a 4-3-3 with xavi pushed up and Lampard and Mix serving box to box.
---Villa---------Nemec-------------Shelton(Or Calle when he is in form)
------------------Xavi--------------------
------Lampard-------------Mix---------------
If that's the formation selection, kiss the playoffs goodbye.IF we do go for xavi, the only formation that would make sense is a 4-3-3 with xavi pushed up and Lampard and Mix serving box to box.
---Villa---------Nemec-------------Shelton(Or Calle when he is in form)
------------------Xavi--------------------
------Lampard-------------Mix---------------
If that's the formation selection, kiss the playoffs goodbye.