They could affiliate with any number of teams in the area (NPSL or USL) that could be used / partnered with NYCFC. Connecticut has teams in Hartford and New Haven.
The TIFOs would write themselves if NYCFC picked Hartford as a USL affiliate
They could affiliate with any number of teams in the area (NPSL or USL) that could be used / partnered with NYCFC. Connecticut has teams in Hartford and New Haven.
I'd venture that Atlanta is #1 and LAFC is #1A only because they haven't finished a full season yet, but LAFC has done everything right so far.MLS expansion ownership/management ranked 2015 and later:
- Atlanta
- LAFC
- NYCFC
- Minnesota
- Orlando
You are right that its 100% CFGs fault we don't have a USL side but I understand the reasoning. CFG doesn't want to have a piece of crap throwaway team at any level. It makes the most sense to have a USL side when the team can mostly be filled with Academy grads to snag the Ibeagha types or if we get lucky the Dwyer types. We aren't there yet. The USL team has to be part of the usage for a new stadium but if we don't need the stadium for a USL team/Women's team the narrative for the new stadium is not as compelling.How can you say this? It's 100% NYCFC's fault that we don't have a USL side. They could affiliate with any number of teams in the area (NPSL or USL) that could be used / partnered with NYCFC. Connecticut has teams in Hartford and New Haven. I know the Hartford team was looking to expand their stadium at a cost of about $10 million. That's pocket change for CFG. Buy the team, build the stadium, and apply for a move to USL.
If we're waiting until a stadium is built before starting a NYCFC2, then we're wasting the talent of some of our homegrown players by having them sit on the bench, missing actual game experience.
i think its because medina is just not used to the physical play here. Almiron played in argentina where they hack you time after time, he needs to practice those one on ones though
I'd venture that Atlanta is #1 and LAFC is #1A only because they haven't finished a full season yet, but LAFC has done everything right so far.
1. Atlanta - they've set the standard on how to operate from academy to scouting to player acquisition.
1A. LAFC - They've done everything right in their short life cycle, but Atlanta is in front because they've had more time to build on it.
2. [NOBODY]
3. FC Cincy - they're blowing the attendance numbers up and their fan base love them (I have friends that go every week) - and for a group that was considered the back of the expansion list of 4, they muscled their way in ahead of schedule and have a stadium going.
4. NYCFC - considering their ambition and monumental screwups (Kreis, Lampard, Pirlo, See my post above for others), their portfolio of work does not live up to their stated ambition or resources.
4A. Minnesota - I'd like to rank them higher because their ownership has been truthful with them that they're going slowly and will open things up with the delivery of the stadium. Honesty still has a place.
5. Orlando - just a dumpster fire......
Based on how the Paraguayan national team has always played, I find it hard to believe they would be less physical than anybody. They are renowned as a very physical and warrior-like team, and their stadium is one of the most feared places in South America based on the intensity of fans and players. So I would assume their domestic league is very physical. Never watched it though.
It was painfully obvious that players were choosing not to pass to him - I don’t think they trust him at this point.
They successfully leveraged the passion of a city with 2 major league teams to get another. Good for them. Nothing in that means they won't build an MLS team like Minnesota (can't spend too much at once) or Orlando, just incapable. Both of those teams have great stadiums, good attendance, and passionate fan bases. OTOH, Cincy could end up developing their team like Atlanta, but it's not even an educated guess at this point to make a prediction. I can't even put them ahead of NYC if you're just measuring attendance because of the somewhat counterintuitive reality that it's easier to do that in a metro area of $2 million and 2 teams than in a 10+mm metro area with 10 other major league teams. But then I almost even put an asterisk next to LAFC as incomplete.3. FC Cincy - they're blowing the attendance numbers up and their fan base love them (I have friends that go every week) - and for a group that was considered the back of the expansion list of 4, they muscled their way in ahead of schedule and have a stadium going.
They have a stadium, so that alone keeps them no worse than a neutral #3They successfully leveraged the passion of a city with 2 major league teams to get another. Good for them. Nothing in that means they won't build an MLS team like Minnesota (can't spend too much at once) or Orlando, just incapable. Both of those teams have great stadiums, good attendance, and passionate fan bases. OTOH, Cincy could end up developing their team like Atlanta, but it's not even an educated guess at this point to make a prediction. I can't even put them ahead of NYC if you're just measuring attendance because of the somewhat counterintuitive reality that it's easier to do that in a metro area of $2 million and 2 teams than in a 10+mm metro area with 10 other major league teams. But then I almost even put an asterisk next to LAFC as incomplete.
Then Orlando and Minnesota go ahead of us.They have a stadium, so that alone keeps them no worse than a neutral #3
Orlando doesn’t because they’ve screwed up in so many other ways that the cache of the stadium is nullified.Then Orlando and Minnesota go ahead of us.
OK, I still disagree, but this is why we each get our own list I guess.Orlando doesn’t because they’ve screwed up in so many other ways that the cache of the stadium is nullified.
I almost ranked Minnesota ahead of us. Their ownership’s frankness and honestly goes a long way.
Yeah, this is way overblown. This is one of the plays I did watch last night. Maybe 1 out of 100 strikers in this league looks to pass off that rebound. Sure, from that angle we can clearly see TMac being open, but that isn't seen as easy from the striker's POV. That wasn't attempting to "cheapen" Meara.Just silly drama
Good strikers are selfish
He sees a rebound off the keeper on Lewis’ shot and he’s in on goal alone. If he takes a second to pick up his head and make the pass Ndam closes it off
Just silly drama
Good strikers are selfish
He sees a rebound off the keeper on Lewis’ shot and he’s in on goal alone. If he takes a second to pick up his head and make the pass Ndam closes it off
I wouldn't be surprised if he meant or said "chip".Yeah, this is way overblown. This is one of the plays I did watch last night. Maybe 1 out of 100 strikers in this league looks to pass off that rebound. Sure, from that angle we can clearly see TMac being open, but that isn't seen as easy from the striker's POV. That wasn't attempting to "cheapen" Meara.
NY Post said:Sure, New York City FC are property of City Football Group, but they have been owned by the rival Red Bulls.