Circumvented because you were polite and didn't bring them up, or because you asked and the rep basically avoided the question?
Asked and avoided...and did not have permission to treat him as a hostile witness.
Circumvented because you were polite and didn't bring them up, or because you asked and the rep basically avoided the question?
I didn't contact them because a few weeks ago I got tired of harassing my ticket rep about what shouldn't be ticket rep business just because the club doesn't communicate well.
I actually fell for this until I re-read the last sentence. Outstanding.My season ticket rep was voted NYCFC employee of the month. He was then transferred to MC's ticket sales office. He may be back this summer though.
The scouting network and Lampard have nothing to do with each other.
The point I was making is that the club is talking up how the scouting network is allowing them to uncover players for NYCFC that other clubs couldn't find. I believe them.
As an example, they might think Andres Mendoza is a steal. For all we know, he could be a future Ecuadorian National Team player. Who knows? The point is that CFG's scouting network uncovered him.
I actually fell for this until I re-read the last sentence. Outstanding.
My rep just guaranteed it.Thank you for sharing! A lot of good things, if you ask me - I'm still hesitant to believe FL will be here in July when there isn't a way to guarantee it - it's my understanding that you can't have two contracts with two clubs at the same time
That's all well and good, but there's still no legally binding contract - they only had an agreement before and FL did well enough on the pitch for MCFC kept himMy rep just guaranteed it.
To be fair, I did tell him that I wasn't really sure I could believe him.That's all well and good, but there's still no legally binding contract - they only had an agreement before and FL did well enough on the pitch for MCFC kept him
well done! I'm not saying I don't believe you or the rep - just not getting my hopes up yetTo be fair, I did tell him that I wasn't really sure I could believe him.
well done! I'm not saying I don't believe you or the rep - just not getting my hopes up yet
So after the developments in this thread I sent the following email to my account rep this evening. I will let everyone know what happens when - and if- he responds.
Hi David
Thanks for the Christmas note. I haven’t written you before but I corresponded previously with Dan Steeves who answered an email I sent to the general Fan Services email. The last time I wrote to him 2-3 weeks ago I promised not to write again except for actual account rep stuff like tickets or billing. But today I read that the club is surprised at the low level of complaints about the Lampard announcement, plus this has crossed over into outright fraud and deception and the club needs to know what fans think of that.
I was not shocked by the December 31 announcement that Lampard was being extended with MCFC indefinitely. Anyone who was not a fool had to see that coming the way things developed in December. I’ve moved past that and don’t want him here ever. But the club announced — with no ambiguity — that Lampard signed a MLS Designated Player contract last summer: "Transaction: New York City FC signs Frank Lampard to a Designated Player contract.” http://www.nycfc.com/post/2014/07/24/welcome-new-york-city-frank-lampard
And now we know that was a lie. In fact Lampard had a contract with MC and according to the League Deputy Commissioner, instead of a true DP MLS contract "He had an overall agreement with [the] owner, City Football Group.” http://www.empireofsoccer.com/questions-answers-lampardgate-31231/ The terms under which Lampard has been playing with MCFC were also falsely characterized as a loan. I note that on this point the league is more directly at fault than NYCFC. You folks carefully never used the word loan on your own pages, but to allow the league to lie to fans like that is not something the club can countenance.
NYCFC needs to come clean on this, to apologize, show contrition, and make amends. That is not done with phone calls where this issue is avoided. It is not done by scouting, or signing other new players. When you wrong someone, when you lie to someone, you have to apologize, confess and ask forgiveness. Then we can move on.
I understand the practice is for reps to call anyone who writes. Please be advised that there is no point in calling me unless you are prepared with substantive responses to the issues I just raised. Calling me to evade this issue, mumble platitudes and discuss scouting will be unproductive for both of us and unpleasant for you. It would be better not to call. I do hope, however, that the club does take the necessary steps to make this right.
Thanks and have a great day.
Mark
I think we have 1 dp until July. Hope I'm wrong.Not happy there won't be a third DP until July
So after the developments in this thread I sent the following email to my account rep this evening. I will let everyone know what happens when - and if- he responds.
Hi David
Thanks for the Christmas note. I haven’t written you before but I corresponded previously with Dan Steeves who answered an email I sent to the general Fan Services email. The last time I wrote to him 2-3 weeks ago I promised not to write again except for actual account rep stuff like tickets or billing. But today I read that the club is surprised at the low level of complaints about the Lampard announcement, plus this has crossed over into outright fraud and deception and the club needs to know what fans think of that.
I was not shocked by the December 31 announcement that Lampard was being extended with MCFC indefinitely. Anyone who was not a fool had to see that coming the way things developed in December. I’ve moved past that and don’t want him here ever. But the club announced — with no ambiguity — that Lampard signed a MLS Designated Player contract last summer: "Transaction: New York City FC signs Frank Lampard to a Designated Player contract.” http://www.nycfc.com/post/2014/07/24/welcome-new-york-city-frank-lampard
And now we know that was a lie. In fact Lampard had a contract with MC and according to the League Deputy Commissioner, instead of a true DP MLS contract "He had an overall agreement with [the] owner, City Football Group.” http://www.empireofsoccer.com/questions-answers-lampardgate-31231/ The terms under which Lampard has been playing with MCFC were also falsely characterized as a loan. I note that on this point the league is more directly at fault than NYCFC. You folks carefully never used the word loan on your own pages, but to allow the league to lie to fans like that is not something the club can countenance.
NYCFC needs to come clean on this, to apologize, show contrition, and make amends. That is not done with phone calls where this issue is avoided. It is not done by scouting, or signing other new players. When you wrong someone, when you lie to someone, you have to apologize, confess and ask forgiveness. Then we can move on.
I understand the practice is for reps to call anyone who writes. Please be advised that there is no point in calling me unless you are prepared with substantive responses to the issues I just raised. Calling me to evade this issue, mumble platitudes and discuss scouting will be unproductive for both of us and unpleasant for you. It would be better not to call. I do hope, however, that the club does take the necessary steps to make this right.
Thanks and have a great day.
Mark