Hey man, don't tie so much of your self-worth up in that thread. You're a valuable part of our community no matter where people talk about salary. Chin up, champ.
?????
Oh shit, sober eyes, damn that sounded off.
Hey man, don't tie so much of your self-worth up in that thread. You're a valuable part of our community no matter where people talk about salary. Chin up, champ.
Sunday's performance at the back sure didnt look like an upgrade.I looked it up, looks like it was used for Mena. Well, at least it upgraded our back line which is what I was hoping for anyway. Good work everyone.
Relax. Just giving you hell.?????
Oh shit, sober eyes, damn that sounded off.
The day we have to use TAM on a DP is the day we know CFG doesn't care anymore. We're always going to have three of the highest paid players in the league, so long as here are only 3 DP spots.
Commit, or be plastic.I don't have time to go get a Ph.D. in this dumb assery just to understand which acronym we need more of, which 3 teams we need to deal with, or what new rule we need to create just so we can sign a new player.
Fuck.
The day we have to use TAM on a DP is the day we know CFG doesn't care anymore. We're always going to have three of the highest paid players in the league, so long as here are only 3 DP spots.
The rule is so ridiculously constructed to fit exactly what the galaxy needed...
Why do you say that?I don't think Mix is here past his contract
Why do you say that?
And this is one of the biggest problems with MLS. We'll never be able to pay Mix a few million that he might be able to make in Europe. It's like we're a two-tiered league. Three great players and one good player, then the other 24. Man City has what might be the equivalent of 15 of our DPs, so many that they have more than they have room for in any given match. Aguero a little tuckered out? No problem, they have three other DP-level strikers available. And DP midfielders. And DP defenders. And a DP keeper.Beyond the fact that he is a bench player for this manager (only partially kidding), I think he will want to move on to European soccer in his prime. He's all about experiences. This is one.
We are decades away from being able to afford DP quality at every position. I only hope I see it in my lifetime.And this is one of the biggest problems with MLS. We'll never be able to pay Mix a few million that he might be able to make in Europe. It's like we're a two-tiered league. Three great players and one good player, then the other 24. Man City has what might be the equivalent of 15 of our DPs, so many that they have more than they have room for in any given match. Aguero a little tuckered out? No problem, they have three other DP-level strikers available. And DP midfielders. And DP defenders. And a DP keeper.
And this is one of the biggest problems with MLS. We'll never be able to pay Mix a few million that he might be able to make in Europe. It's like we're a two-tiered league. Three great players and one good player, then the other 24. Man City has what might be the equivalent of 15 of our DPs, so many that they have more than they have room for in any given match. Aguero a little tuckered out? No problem, they have three other DP-level strikers available. And DP midfielders. And DP defenders. And a DP keeper.
Whether we could afford it or not, which we can, we're not allowed to by rule. I get that not all the teams have the money we happen to have, but it just seems to me that only being allowed to have four players that are stars is going to limit the league's growth, not help it.We are decades away from being able to afford DP quality at every position. I only hope I see it in my lifetime.
I didn't mean we (NYCFC) can't afford it. I meant we (MLS as a league in general and most teams specifically) can't afford it. Soccer in America has proven that unlimited spending is a great way to bankrupt the league. Aggravating as it is, I think it's right to take a slow approach to our spending growth.Whether we could afford it or not, which we can, we're not allowed to by rule. I get that not all the teams have the money we happen to have, but it just seems to me that only being allowed to have four players that are stars is going to limit the league's growth, not help it.
I totally get that. But then you get a league that *might* be comparable to the Championship but is nowhere near the Premiership. And as a perfect example you're in the situation we're in: offensive powerhouse with no defense and not allowed to get another truly quality player.I didn't mean we (NYCFC) can't afford it. I meant we (MLS as a league in general and most teams specifically) can't afford it. Soccer in America has proven that unlimited spending is a great way to bankrupt the league. Aggravating as it is, I think it's right to take a slow approach to our spending growth.
Yeah that really bothers me about MLS.And this is one of the biggest problems with MLS. We'll never be able to pay Mix a few million that he might be able to make in Europe. It's like we're a two-tiered league. Three great players and one good player, then the other 24. Man City has what might be the equivalent of 15 of our DPs, so many that they have more than they have room for in any given match. Aguero a little tuckered out? No problem, they have three other DP-level strikers available. And DP midfielders. And DP defenders. And a DP keeper.
This.Its pathetic that the league minimum is 50k.