I'm ok with a no name until Villa retires.They're not even scouting players that are famous. Don't get your hopes up. That being said, who would have thought we would get the return we've gotten from Ring and Chanot?
I'm ok with a no name until Villa retires.They're not even scouting players that are famous. Don't get your hopes up. That being said, who would have thought we would get the return we've gotten from Ring and Chanot?
They aren't getting money directly from FOX. But because Pulisic is American, FOX is more likely to show Dortmund thus more people are likely to follow Dortmund if they don't have a club and buy products. It's indirectly related revenue streams.
More people are following Dortmund because of Pulisic, more people are watching FOX, ratings go up, new TV deal is worth more, more money goes to Dortmund.
It'll also be nice to have a coach that has a similar tactical head as PV. Our possession play and quick passing has been kinda revolutionary in MLS.Yeah. I just want one headliner striker to lead this team at all times.
Agree. I think it's at least as likely we have Herrera next year as it is that TPFKAU is on the roster.I hope you're wrong on Herrera. I would put him as "moderately likely". I don't think he's ready to start in any league that's more than two standard deviations above MLS. I don't see him starting in Ligue One or Portugal, maybe Portugal for a small team. Why would CFG transfer him to Belgium, Turkey or the Netherlands (also I don't know their visa requirements) for 6 or 7 million at the start of 2018? With one full season as a starter and a pillar for NYCFC he could probably go straight to one of the bigger leagues and command a fee above 10 or 15 million. I hope I'm right. I don't see him with us in 2019.
He's paid like a starter because he's starter quality. Right now, it looks pretty smart.I like Brillant but I think we're paying him too much for a depth player in MLS. Hoping he gets sold/cut/ contract not renewed.
I think you're on the right track when you start mentioning the discrepancy among the top and the rest in leagues such as Belgium and Portugal - possibly Netherlands too.I was not using the idea of standard deviation very rigorously. Also, MLS is a strange bird because of the forced parity. TFC is better than Minnesota, but not to the degree that Chelsea was better than Sunderland or Real Madrid better than Granada. That creates some confusion. Maybe it's just the fact that Portugal's big clubs such as Benfica or Porto would obliterate MLS competition. But maybe we can put up a fight with mid to low table teams from that league. With what PSG is doing right now in Ligue One the situation is getting even more skewed in leagues that are not even with the best but have a super team that could win UCL. But my very broad impression is that leagues such as Liga MX, Turkey, Belgium, etc. are slightly better than MLS. Then there's definitely a higher level European league below the elites, where Eredivisie, Portugal, Ligue One, maybe others would slot. You could even argue that League One is above that but still below the juggernaut leagues. My impression is you could make several tiers of European domestic leagues and there still would be at least 3 tiers above MLS.
We have to. Other clubs don't.The reason being that we can buy guys of the level of Chanot, Ring etc, plus 3 DPs but we also have to field Ethan White and RJ level players, so we're more uneven in our starting XI level, and also forbidden from assembling super teams.
Why would you move one of our best attackers to a spot where he sucks? And if the first part of your post happens, as it probably should, then No Sweat won't be starting anywhere, thank God.Also i think once Wallace is fully fit either he should play LB or RB(prefer to keep him on the left and Ben Sweat to the right)
Because this year it's only one team being added, are we able to protect more players?Remember guys, there's also an expansion draft next year for LAFC.
NYCFC will likely lose some secondary players so they will need to add depth.
Maybe T-Mac can bring back the mullet on his return to LA.Remember guys, there's also an expansion draft next year for LAFC.
NYCFC will likely lose some secondary players so they will need to add depth.
So Sweats gone...Remember guys, there's also an expansion draft next year for LAFC.
NYCFC will likely lose some secondary players so they will need to add depth.
Remember guys, there's also an expansion draft next year for LAFC.
NYCFC will likely lose some secondary players so they will need to add depth.
So Sweats gone...
Ok lets spitball this.
Players we protect 100%.
Villa
Harrison
Chanot
Callens
Sean Johnson
Ring
Herrera
Mataritta
8/11 spots I feel comfortable saying will be protected no matter what.
Players we might protect (pick three)
Brillant
Okoli
Lopez
Sweat (Only if he stays on a cap friendly salary, I love him at his current salary and he's great for depth, if he wants to go above 80k I don't like him anymore.)
Wallace
White
Players we don't have to protect but are protected due to gen Adidas or homegrown status.
Jlew
Sands
International loans (smart teams don't pick players who are on loan)
Carmago
So right here we have 14 protected guys. And an expansion team is prevented from taking more than 2 players from any one team. Bonus points is that we don't have to protect a third DP because we will likely sign our DP after the expansion draft so we get to "save" one additional depth player. So really we've functionally protected 15 guys, thats the starting 11 plus 4 bench players. I suspect that there are other teams who are going to be able to protect far fewer players than that, and you're much more likely to find quality there.
Why would you take 25 year old Ben Sweat a first year team is doing everything they can to find some kind of quality somewhere. You don't get to worry about depth until year two or three. I don't think we protect Sweat and I don't think we loose him either. Though to be fair I'm kind of speaking out of my ass because I don't really know how many other good/decent wingbacks would be available in the rest of the league.
Ok lets spitball this.
Players we protect 100%.
Villa
Harrison
Chanot
Callens
Sean Johnson
Ring
Herrera
Mataritta
8/11 spots I feel comfortable saying will be protected no matter what.
Players we might protect (pick three)
Brillant
Okoli
Lopez
Sweat (Only if he stays on a cap friendly salary, I love him at his current salary and he's great for depth, if he wants to go above 80k I don't like him anymore.)
Wallace
White
Players we don't have to protect but are protected due to gen Adidas or homegrown status.
Jlew
Sands
International loans (smart teams don't pick players who are on loan)
Carmago
So right here we have 14 protected guys. And an expansion team is prevented from taking more than 2 players from any one team. Bonus points is that we don't have to protect a third DP because we will likely sign our DP after the expansion draft so we get to "save" one additional depth player. So really we've functionally protected 15 guys, thats the starting 11 plus 4 bench players. I suspect that there are other teams who are going to be able to protect far fewer players than that, and you're much more likely to find quality there.
Why would you take 25 year old Ben Sweat a first year team is doing everything they can to find some kind of quality somewhere. You don't get to worry about depth until year two or three. I don't think we protect Sweat and I don't think we loose him either. Though to be fair I'm kind of speaking out of my ass because I don't really know how many other good/decent wingbacks would be available in the rest of the league.
Remind me, do loanees need to be protected? They aren't addressed directly in last year's rules: http://pressbox.mlssoccer.com/content/2016-expansion-draft-rules-and-regulations
My gut says yes.
I completely forgot about the Generation Adidas and Homegrown protection rules. Harrison will 100% graduate as a Generation Adidas player this year but will it be before or after the expansion draft? If after, we save another player.