So, we get Orlando, Philly and Chicago. Yes, the 3 toughest, but we should still do well with that.
OK this page says SLo3 3 plays Slots 1, 4 and 5, which is consistent with Orlando, Philly, CHicago like Brooklyn Blue said.
But NYCC says, "Two clubs will advance from Group A, the only Eastern Conference group comprised of six teams, with NYCFC’s opponents and schedule to be released by the league at a later date."
MLS is Back Tournament | New York City FC Drawn into Group A | New York City FC
New York City FC have been drawn into Group A of the MLS is Back Tournament alongside Orlando City SC, Inter Miami, Philadelphia Union, Chicago Fire and Nashville SC. NYCFC will face Orlando City, Chicago Fire and Philadelphia Union in their three group stage matches of the tournament which...www.nycfc.com
So which is it?
So rigged. Of course we play RB. Seattle plays Portland, Dallas plays Houston......oh wait?
So rigged. Of course we play RB. Seattle plays Portland, Dallas plays Houston......oh wait?
no but you get toronto v montreal, lag vs lafc ....RB vs atlanta ( teams still hate each other). and smaller ones like RSL vs colorado. and even mls favorite rivalry of us vs orlando
So, we get Orlando, Philly and Chicago. Yes, the 3 toughest, but we should still do well with that.
no but you get toronto v montreal, lag vs lafc ....RB vs atlanta ( teams still hate each other). and smaller ones like RSL vs colorado. and even mls favorite rivalry of us vs orlando
I'm far too lazy to run the numbers, but given that each rivalry had roughly a 1/3 chance of being drawn (adjust however you want for the pre-drawn opener), I wonder how many universally accepted rivalries got drawn. Was it notably greater than 1 in 3? Considering Sea/Port, NYC/NJRB and other big ones didn't get drawn I'd say the whole "rigged" thought is more of a reflection of how jaded fans are at this point.I'm probably thinking it's less than 50% likely it was rigged. But under the format it was impossible to accomplish every rivalry. Pointing out that not every one happened isn't proof, just as listing ones that are in place isn't opposite proof.
But if you wanted to rig the draw, the format they chose was completely well suited for it. They deserve accusations of rigging simply for using such a ridiculous, easily manipulated system.
I'm far too lazy to run the numbers, but given that each rivalry had roughly a 1/3 chance of being drawn (adjust however you want for the pre-drawn opener), I wonder how many universally accepted rivalries got drawn. Was it notably greater than 1 in 3? Considering Sea/Port, NYC/NJRB and other big ones didn't get drawn I'd say the whole "rigged" thought is more of a reflection of how jaded fans are at this point.
I'm far too lazy to run the numbers, but given that each rivalry had roughly a 1/3 chance of being drawn (adjust however you want for the pre-drawn opener), I wonder how many universally accepted rivalries got drawn. Was it notably greater than 1 in 3? Considering Sea/Port, NYC/NJRB and other big ones didn't get drawn I'd say the whole "rigged" thought is more of a reflection of how jaded fans are at this point.
This is the best substantive comment on the draw.So, in Group A, we get the other 3 legacy teams and neither of the expansion teams.
Each of Orlando, Philly and Chicago get both of the expansion teams. There’s a good chance each has 6 points, not counting games against us.
We could end up with 5 or 6 points and finish 4th and get left out.
This just seems like something people need to find now whenever any groups are created. Which one is the "Group of Death".im seeing so many "groups of death" comments online. but teams have not played competitively for three months and who knows how the hell teams will react to the circumstances
Certainly feels like some scales were tipped. But when you've got a league run entirely by the owners who's pockets are lined with SUM cash, what else would you expect?