Marito
Registered
And because it is such a complex situation, I wonder whether the idiots at MLS website will even review it on their review of contested referee decisions. They like to look knowledgeable, and they won't if they get into this.
MLS - May 15 - Toronto (Home)
- Thread starter LionNYC
- Start date
And because it is such a complex situation, I wonder whether the idiots at MLS website will even review it on their review of contested referee decisions. They like to look knowledgeable, and they won't if they get into this.
Marito
Registered
On balance, I am with Mark G. on the evaluation of the game: we've learned to play much better without Maxi than we used to, and we're becoming a very very solid defensive side. Sands in the middle of the defense is invaluable. He's elite. Yesterday we decided to live on a knife's edge throwing Jasson to mark Soteldo, and still the rotations of the other defenders were able to control the danger reasonably well once Soteldo had blown by Jasson (which was pretty much always). Same with Gudi against Laryea. I think Acevedo had a very good shift.
I now lean to believing this is one of those rules where ref discretion is so broad that both the Benzema and Medina calls can be deemed correct, and refs/ league officials, and people in the know accept that as the cost of having reasonable flexible rules, while fans seethe over massive inconsistency. So maybe the people saying the call is correct are completely justified AND it is impossible to make that consistent with the Benzema call.
I know that was an egregious mistake, but some credit has to be given to Medina on this (and I’m not saying you’re not giving him credit).
This was a hustle goal predicated on him applying pressure and looking to pounce in case a rebound occurred and it did. I can remember way back when I was like 8-9 years old in soccer practice and always being drilled to follow up on the shot.
Instant Replay video 100% say the goal should have stood.
www.mlssoccer.com
Also, looking at it, I think Ganter had his back to the play as he headed upfield and turned around only after he heard the ball hit Medina. You can also see the linesman follow the ball bounce and trickle towards goal after that event, which indicates he did not think the play was dead. I think Ganter did not see it, turned around, saw Medina crumble, and blew his whistle.
Did Nani push the referee? Should NYCFC's goal have stood? | MLSSoccer.com
Official MLS highlights, classic matches, video series and features.
www.mlssoccer.com
Also, looking at it, I think Ganter had his back to the play as he headed upfield and turned around only after he heard the ball hit Medina. You can also see the linesman follow the ball bounce and trickle towards goal after that event, which indicates he did not think the play was dead. I think Ganter did not see it, turned around, saw Medina crumble, and blew his whistle.
Instant Replay video 100% say the goal should have stood.
Did Nani push the referee? Should NYCFC's goal have stood? | MLSSoccer.com
Official MLS highlights, classic matches, video series and features.
Also, looking at it, I think Ganter had his back to the play as he headed upfield and turned around only after he heard the ball hit Medina. You can also see the linesman follow the ball bounce and trickle towards goal after that event, which indicates he did not think the play was dead. I think Ganter did not see it, turned around, saw Medina crumble, and blew his whistle.
3 years - 3 ref failures that result in us losing our head and resulting in a loss or draw.
2019 - throw-in gate vs NJRB
2020 - the ball is round REF vs NJRB
2021 - Ref doesn't understand Law 12 vs TFC
I'm sure there are more, but those are the ones that stand out for me. Hopefully that is our one major ref failure for the year and we can expect better officiating.... probably not.
These things do go the other way as well, we just don't remember them as much.
The one that pops to mind immediately was a home game against LAG where Villa scored a goal while he was well offsides. Believe it was a deflected shot from someone else and DV was completely offsides when it was taken. I wanna say VAR was in place then and they just didn't take a look at it, but I'm not completely sure on that detail.
I also remember a goal scored by the Dynamo on a free kick where they never set the ball and a goal that NYCFC scored against the Revs where the ref blew the whistle on a phantom foul before NYCFC scored - goal should have stood.
what I don’t get is this “ref blows the whistle, can’t look at ANYTHING after that on VAR.”. If that is the case the guidance to refs should be to be hesitant in blowing their whistle, instead it is VERY inconsistent. In some instances the play goes on for seconds afterwards and in others the ref blows right away.
either get rid of that rule or tell the refs to wait several seconds before they hastily stop play.
Put the system on trial.
linesmen are already told to keep the flag down if the offsides call is at all close. and only raise it after the play has ended and there's no threat of scoring a goal.
So, this guidance is already in place. Gantar and his linesmen just didn't follow it.
I find it hard to believe that in the year 2021, with everything we have at our disposal and all that has been experienced in the history of soccer... that the sound of a whistle made in haste and error by a human, creates an impenetrable shield against the correct outcome. Truly amazing.
As long as you're cool with players never stopping play when whistles blow.
How much “play” happened between the ball going off Medina’s head and going into the net?
Oh, you're making a rule just for this incident.
This is on the ref for blowing the whistle before the ball hit the net. He and his linesmen were making calls as if VAR and its protocol didn't exist.
We lost 2 points due to an error and it would be unfair to change the outcome after the fact. But the refs need to be sanctioned if they haven't already
