I actually liked what Pirlo brought to the game higher up. Since Montreal couldn't key on Pirlo to bring every play forward, they couldn't double-team anybody with success, so we nearly always got the ball to midfield without a problem. Once there, Pirlo was given the ball and he made some very nice passes to start the attacking sequences, and he made others that (have already been mentioned) were snuffed out by the defense because we just don't have the height to bring lobs down - but that's not necessarily the fault of Pirlo, because they were great lobs that if connected would have sprung a direct drive on net by the forward.Alot of people here have been clamoring to play Pirlo in one of the forward CM spots, and we saw why that was a dumb idea. Pirlo has to play as a deep lying playermaker. If you want defensive help we have to play with a double pivot whether its a 4231 or a 433 with two holding midfielders or the 3223 or even a 4222.
Ronald and Tommy combined very well with together on the left side. Same thing with Khiry and RJ. Khiry has really impressed me with his improved crossing service the last couple of games. I feel that right side would have been even better with Mix. Lopez's distribution leaves alot to be desired.
I thought Mendoza is much better in the role off the bench. Hopefully RJ is not too hurt.
Many games I have questioned PV's subs, but I find it hard to do so again. I wanted Mix on for Mikey at the half, but think Mendoza on for Khiry was the right move. Then as you pointed out, the RJ injury forced his hand there. Which lead to him waiting much longer to use the third.
So, so smart.Just an FYI, you can AirPlay from the Fox Sports app on your phone to your Appletv. That's what I do for champions league.
It was a Wednesday night, man. Bleachers were pretty full considering but there is a certain amount of reserve when you have to go to work in the morning. That's my guess anyway. As for the drums, they weren't picked up or requested barring a corny chant in the middle of the game.
At least he was in the 18 this time.While we are on the subject of subs, I was unimpressed by the "We want Poku" chant *after* we had used up all three.
I meant more lack of energy
Watch the replay of the goal. Saunders is nearly on the front post, and first backtracks and then goes back forward - he's late to the post because of the change in momentum/hesitation. GK 101 is that it's easier and faster to go forward than back, so one should always be in a deeper starting position thus allowing the only movement needed is to go forward. It's also his responsibility to call out for a teammate to cover the front post so that he can start farther back. - in effect, he had two gaffes on that play.
100% saunders fault your having a laugh mate. by your logic we dont need defenders at corners as the goalie is expected to cover the whole goalYou are partially right. Saunders was in fact 100% to blame. As a former GK you are taught that a cross, especially a low cross that close to the net, on the near/front post, 2 feet in front of you, you ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO HAVE IT, or at the very least get your fists on it and push it to the side. Yes Ethan White is an idiot for not marking, but even still the GK is supposed to be there to bail out his defense especially on a night where he face TWO SHOTS. TWO SHOTS!!!!! You can tell both reactions from White and Saunders says it all. Ethan couldn't believe that ball went in, and Saunders had his hands on his head, thinking WTF did I do. 100% on Saunders.
You just made me picture Drogba on a horse looking like a Dothraki warlord. Montreal needs to get on that TIFO statDrogue is a god.
100% saunders fault your having a laugh mate. by your logic we dont need defenders at corners as the goalie is expected to cover the whole goal
100% saunders fault your having a laugh mate. by your logic we dont need defenders at corners as the goalie is expected to cover the whole goal
Sorry i miss typed, meant to put free kick. Though from the angle it was not much difference to a corner, cross put into the box from a wide position. Your questioning my knowledge yet you seem to think that defenders are not necessary in these situations.Wow do I really have to respond to this? Is this the type of knowledge some of you folks have about some of these plays and the sport in general? SMH....you are actually comparing the play last night to a corner, really? Get a clue homie.
Don't put words in my mouth. I have never said defenders are not necessary. I said Ethan White made a mistake but it was a mistake that the GK should have covered for from that angle, and from that ball trajectory (height/angle/speed). Fucking Saunders had to do NOTHING the whole game, when it is time to make one stinking play, he doesn't make it, and we want to give him a pass. GTFO.Sorry i miss typed, meant to put free kick. Though from the angle it was not much difference to a corner, cross put into the box from a wide position. Your questioning my knowledge yet you seem to think that defenders are not necessary in these situations.
As i just said it basically is a corner but the point is that with any set piece there is a marking system either zonal or man marking so every opposition player should have a player competing for the ball with them and hopefully goal side. As it is everyone was just caught ball watching and a player can head the ball in completely unmarkedLook at this video http://matchcenter.mlssoccer.com/ma...ity-fc-vs-montreal-impact/details/video/63484.
Does this look like a corner to you? If covering the front post with a position player was of utmost important, just like it is for a corner, then guess whose job it is to put someone on the post? Its the GKs, so you are not really making a case for Saunders. No, there was no need to have someone on the front post because there was no way a right footed cross was going to be dangerous at the front post unless the GK completely shits the bed which is exactly what happened. Look at Saunders initial reactions, he plays it like a fucking corner, no wonder they scored on that play. You have got to be kidding me!!!!! You want to talk about logic etc GTFO and come back to me when you have some worthwhile opinions. Anyone excusing Saunders for that goal is a fucking idiot.
As i just said it basically is a corner but the point is that with any set piece there is a marking system either zonal or man marking so every opposition player should have a player competing for the ball with them and hopefully goal side. As it is everyone was just caught ball watching and a player can head the ball in completely unmarked
You said it was 100% on Saunders and now your saying other players made mistakes so can you make your mind up please... Look i want Lurch to start as much as everyone else and the rest of the game was irrelevant really as in this instance i don't see why Saunders should be getting the majority of the blame.Don't put words in my mouth. I have never said defenders are not necessary. I said Ethan White made a mistake but it was a mistake that the GK should have covered for from that angle, and from that ball trajectory (height/angle/speed). Fucking Saunders had to do NOTHING the whole game, when it is time to make one stinking play, he doesn't make it, and we want to give him a pass. GTFO.
You said it was 100% on Saunders and now your saying other players made mistakes so can you make your mind up please... Look i want Lurch to start as much as everyone else and the rest of the game was irrelevant really as in this instance i don't see why Saunders should be getting the majority of the blame.