The Post is using a pro-Red Bull photographer and the story is how the Red Bulls lost the game rather than how NYCFC won it. I guess The Post and their readership is based in NJ.
They're the only local media outlet that covers the team regularly, and you did not manage to read the tweet well enough to know the difference between the writer and photographer until I point it out to you, and then you change your complaint after your error is pointed out. One might suspect you first decided to criticize the Post and went looking for a reason. How about the Daily News and NY Times give the team no steady coverage and have zero MLS beat writers?
And as long as MLS is not big enough to force the Post to have multiple beat writers cover the same game between the 2 area teams and write multiple articles, like they would do for Jets/Giants or Yankee/Mets, then every such article is going to be more about one team than the other. It's a 50-50 shot, and sometimes comes up bad. The editor can't wait until the game is over and the result is known to assign a writer who knows the winning team and has good contacts with them. Maybe Schnitzer was sick, on vacation, or had a wedding to go to. I'm happy the Post actually has more than one MLS-capable writer on staff. The other papers have a combined zero.
And how in hell did you even find that tweet which originally set you off from the unrelated NY Post writer who happens to be a Red Bull fan when she doesn't cover sports, and had nothing to do with the article or photo? Do you actively search for stupid Red Bull fans saying obnoxious things only to get yourself worked up?
