I can live with a rebuild. My asks are…
1) Tell hs and be honest about something for once. Explain that MLS rules hamstring us and it will take 3 cycles to improve and
2) Admit the Academy isn’t turning out starting MLS players. That’s the MLS hack. One or even two HGs in your lineup makes everything SO MUCH easier
I will say this: David Lee should absolutely be doing an interview -- even with the team website -- explaining what's happening this offseason and what the plan is. Can you imagine Brian Cashman going a full year without once addressing the media (and by definition, the fans?) The last time we heard from David Lee was, I think, the championship parade. I know he likes being behind the scenes and doesn't like to be front-facing, but he's the sporting director. He really should be explaining what the plan is so we understand.
And I know his answers won't be fully revealing and will still leave us with questions. It's still better than nothing.
CFG is notoriously tight-lipped, and they treat the media in America the way they treat it in England. It would be nice if that changes one day.
Disagree?
1) I’m not assuming that. We won’t really know until July anyway.I can live with a rebuild. My asks are…
1) Tell hs and be honest about something for once. Explain that MLS rules hamstring us and it will take 3 cycles to improve and
2) Admit the Academy isn’t turning out starting MLS players. That’s the MLS hack. One or even two HGs in your lineup makes everything SO MUCH easier
I'm not taking anything this account passes along as info he's been told correctly as good info until he provides some information that isn't basically a Google translate of someone else's tweet.Also this account backs what Abramowitz said about Callens. The Boca repoerts were way oversold. Nothing is final and Callens might even be more likely to return than not.
Would that be a sign-and-trade scenario? We'd have to sign him at max TAM and then trade him to the other team, correct?Worth mentioning that Taylor Twellman basically confirmed a possibility that I had meant to post here. That another MLS team could come to an agreement with Callens (or Johnson) that exceeds the MLS rules around free agency. Then the team would have to do a trade with us for his rights. Not all that complicated, and its something that you see in other U.S. sports leagues.
1 - the club is not going to come out and say "yea we're in rebuilding phase for the next 3 seasons... so keep buying tickets and coming to games!" obviously the club is going out to try to sign players. we need them. our roster is thin. what more do you want to know? specific names? that'll never happen.
2 - last i checked, we have 3 home growns on the roster.. 1 that starts consistently and another who will probably get a lot more time this season. did you want more?
1) The club should be open about their roster construction priorities. They haven’t been. Don’t need names, just acknowledgement. We’re terrible at that
2) Are any of our homegrowns a Top 10 player at their position in MLS? Top 20?
Basically, yes. We hold his rights, which means that another MLS team can't sign him unless either (a) they acquire those rights or (b) an exception applies. Since Callens qualifies as a Free Agent, there is an exception for signing him up to the applicable limit. To sign him at a higher salary, they'll need to first acquire the rights from us.Would that be a sign-and-trade scenario? We'd have to sign him at max TAM and then trade him to the other team, correct?
1) nothing new. not sure why you'd expect more all of a sudden?
2) are any homegrowns on any other team in the league a top 10 player in their position? our homegrowns who would have been a top 10 player were already loaned or sold to europe. do dallas and philly have top 10 home growns? pretty sure they've sold theirs too.
Yeap. Sold theirs and brought through new ones. And outside of Justin Che, didn’t loan any of them out. Capitalized on their asset
i don't see your point.
Dallas plays a bunch of home growns and hasn't performed well in the league for years now.
Philly has maybe 1 or 2 homegrowns on their squad. can't think of a single who was a starter this past season. how is this any different from us?
you're acknowledging they sold them. we've loaned and/or sold ours. our only issue is we don't lock down academy talent before they can run off to europe without getting us any benefit.
if you're trying to say they produce better players out of the academy then maybe. but this goes back to the argument that their academies have been around longer and have more established facilities. to that point, i'm confident the club will push more resources into the academy once the stadium stuff is done and dusted.
There is no MAYBE they produce better Academy players.
yes - your grand declaration must make it true!
Over the past half-dozen years, NYCFC's academy has produced first team starters, first team backups and players on squads in Europe at a rate higher than the average MLS team - and that's despite the issues created by its relative youth and challenges with facilities. For this, the Club deserves a lot of credit.
There has been a noticeable drop-off in the last couple of years. Whether that's due to the natural ebb and flow of when talent arises or because of bigger, systemic issues is worth debating.