2023 Roster and Transfer Discussion Thread

Which positions do you think need a new signing?

  • Goalkeeper

    Votes: 3 5.8%
  • Center back

    Votes: 20 38.5%
  • Left back

    Votes: 12 23.1%
  • Right back

    Votes: 17 32.7%
  • Defensive Midfielder

    Votes: 5 9.6%
  • Midfielder (standard)

    Votes: 12 23.1%
  • Attacking Midfielder

    Votes: 12 23.1%
  • Striker (forward)

    Votes: 48 92.3%
  • Left Winger

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Right Winger

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    52
Fantastic news!! Expedite that visa and get back here!! He should be able to slot right in behind the Brazilians
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert


Lots of stuff in here about Santi returning, throw it through translate if you need. 5 year contract, Lee apparently was in Montevideo twice to negotiate.
Is it common for sporting directors to go to the country of a player rather than have the player come to them?
 
Is it common for sporting directors to go to the country of a player rather than have the player come to them?

I have no idea but the whole thing is bizarre considering he's been on the team for the last 2 years. Was this a last-second change of plans after so many others departed? Why wasn't this all worked out over the summer or toward the end of last year when he was still with the team? The timing and pace that our front office moves is just perplexing at times.
 
I have no idea but the whole thing is bizarre considering he's been on the team for the last 2 years. Was this a last-second change of plans after so many others departed? Why wasn't this all worked out over the summer or toward the end of last year when he was still with the team? The timing and pace that our front office moves is just perplexing at times.

seems to me that things have changed since callens and johnson left. there's more money to go around and there's a chance other prospects they were looking at didn't pan out either. so now they can go to santi with a different proposal.

if that spanish site news is correct, then we're just waiting on documents, which is out of the club's hands. i just hope santi is training!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and Shwafta
I have no idea but the whole thing is bizarre considering he's been on the team for the last 2 years. Was this a last-second change of plans after so many others departed? Why wasn't this all worked out over the summer or toward the end of last year when he was still with the team? The timing and pace that our front office moves is just perplexing at times.

probably the length of contract. normally nycfc gives out what 2-3 years at most in contracts. Santi probably wanted longer deal ( job security? )and why there was hesitation on nycfc part at first.
 
probably the length of contract. normally nycfc gives out what 2-3 years at most in contracts. Santi probably wanted longer deal ( job security? )and why there was hesitation on nycfc part at first.
I would guess that Santi and/or his representatives, knowing that the team would see a lot of turnover at the end of the season, were playing a long game looking for the best possible deal. So he was not in a hurry. And there's a chance NYCFC wasn't either, since the start of the season is pretty meaningless from a pragmatic perspective.

I have no idea how it is in other SA countries, and what levers NYCFC may have at hand, but at least in Peru, the permanent native chaos plus backlog because of COVID plus chaos at the State Dept during Trump's gov has put the wait to get a Visa interview at 2 years. No kidding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
There also were reports several weeks back that Santi was hoping to go somewhere besides Torque or NYCFC but the interest was not as high as he hoped. NYCFC had to wait for that to play out. Sometimes the club doesn't control the direction or timing.

This is a good point, it's possible Santi believed his value was higher than it actually was. If that was the case good move by the club to let him test the market as opposed to getting stuck in negotiations with Santi and his team demanding more than he's actually worth.
 
This is admittedly a bit half-baked but is there any chance the team intentionally delays signing a chunk of our roster each year as a way to try to gain a salary cap advantage? As others have pointed out the 1st 15 games of the season are mostly meaningless with how many teams make the playoffs. If every season you hold off on 2-3 signings for about 25-35% of the season that's a fairly sizeable cap/GAM/TAM savings depending on which contracts you do it with. Say this year we hold off on a DP ($400K cap hit) and two $700K TAM/Gam-type players for 30% of the season that's a $540K savings.

In a capped league trying to drive parity is it possible that this is some sort of money ball approach by our front office or am I overthinking it and we are just slow with our signings?
I think there's something to this.

Relatedly, MLS is not the only league to incentivize this sort of manipulation. Currently the NHL Rangers are waiting to trade for Patrick Kane from the Blackhawks, but the deal has been on hold for about 10 days while the Rangers wait out his cap hit dropping to a manageable number and they move a bunch of players around and put some on temporary waivers to make it work. Rangers fans are going crazy waiting for it to be official and there is some reason to expect it gets announced tonight after 5pm. There have been last minute complications because most of the players being moved around temporarily are defensemen and one of the team's regular defensemen is facing suspension for (probably accidentally) spitting on an opposing player on Sunday, rendering him unavailable but of course counting against the cap. It's kind of laughable. Also Kane has let it be known he won't accept a trade to anyone but the Rangers so the Blackhawks have no other options. Oh, and the trade deadline is some time on Friday this week.
 
So it's looking likely that Keaton and Santi are going to be (assuming neither drops quality or forces a move or something) part of the core going into our new stadium? I

we need a destroyer. not sure morales can stay healthy enough to take us into our new stadium. haak is not living up to expectations (imo) so far. if Sands comes back, we'll have one of the best midfields in the league, i think.
 
we need a destroyer. not sure morales can stay healthy enough to take us into our new stadium. haak is not living up to expectations (imo) so far. if Sands comes back, we'll have one of the best midfields in the league, i think.
Morales is likely too old to get to 2027. And yes, we do need a strong #6. Most important position on the field if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and moogoo
So it's looking likely that Keaton and Santi are going to be (assuming neither drops quality or forces a move or something) part of the core going into our new stadium? I
Hot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.
 
Hot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.
Would you make the same wager now, including anyone signed through the end of the summer transfer window? (meaning the assumption we sign some big named, multi-year signing.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Would you make the same wager now, including anyone signed through the end of the summer transfer window? (meaning the assumption we sign some big named, multi-year signing.)
I actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?
 
I actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?
I will take care of escrow.
 
I actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?
i will currently take the current deal with the current stipulations ;)
 
  • Love
Reactions: adam