Is it common for sporting directors to go to the country of a player rather than have the player come to them?Santiago Rodríguez deja el fútbol uruguayo y firma contrato por cinco años con New York City
El delantero, que en su vuelta a Uruguay jugó un solo partido con Montevideo City Torque, regresa a la MLS de Estados Unidos.espndeportes.espn.com
Lots of stuff in here about Santi returning, throw it through translate if you need. 5 year contract, Lee apparently was in Montevideo twice to negotiate.
Is it common for sporting directors to go to the country of a player rather than have the player come to them?
I have no idea but the whole thing is bizarre considering he's been on the team for the last 2 years. Was this a last-second change of plans after so many others departed? Why wasn't this all worked out over the summer or toward the end of last year when he was still with the team? The timing and pace that our front office moves is just perplexing at times.
I have no idea but the whole thing is bizarre considering he's been on the team for the last 2 years. Was this a last-second change of plans after so many others departed? Why wasn't this all worked out over the summer or toward the end of last year when he was still with the team? The timing and pace that our front office moves is just perplexing at times.
I would guess that Santi and/or his representatives, knowing that the team would see a lot of turnover at the end of the season, were playing a long game looking for the best possible deal. So he was not in a hurry. And there's a chance NYCFC wasn't either, since the start of the season is pretty meaningless from a pragmatic perspective.probably the length of contract. normally nycfc gives out what 2-3 years at most in contracts. Santi probably wanted longer deal ( job security? )and why there was hesitation on nycfc part at first.
There also were reports several weeks back that Santi was hoping to go somewhere besides Torque or NYCFC but the interest was not as high as he hoped. NYCFC had to wait for that to play out. Sometimes the club doesn't control the direction or timing.
I think there's something to this.This is admittedly a bit half-baked but is there any chance the team intentionally delays signing a chunk of our roster each year as a way to try to gain a salary cap advantage? As others have pointed out the 1st 15 games of the season are mostly meaningless with how many teams make the playoffs. If every season you hold off on 2-3 signings for about 25-35% of the season that's a fairly sizeable cap/GAM/TAM savings depending on which contracts you do it with. Say this year we hold off on a DP ($400K cap hit) and two $700K TAM/Gam-type players for 30% of the season that's a $540K savings.
In a capped league trying to drive parity is it possible that this is some sort of money ball approach by our front office or am I overthinking it and we are just slow with our signings?
So it's looking likely that Keaton and Santi are going to be (assuming neither drops quality or forces a move or something) part of the core going into our new stadium? I
Morales is likely too old to get to 2027. And yes, we do need a strong #6. Most important position on the field if you ask me.we need a destroyer. not sure morales can stay healthy enough to take us into our new stadium. haak is not living up to expectations (imo) so far. if Sands comes back, we'll have one of the best midfields in the league, i think.
Hot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.So it's looking likely that Keaton and Santi are going to be (assuming neither drops quality or forces a move or something) part of the core going into our new stadium? I
Coach ChanotHot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.
Hot take: BarrazaHot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.
Would you make the same wager now, including anyone signed through the end of the summer transfer window? (meaning the assumption we sign some big named, multi-year signing.)Hot take: Not a single player currently on this current roster will take the field in our new stadium wearing an NYCFC kit. At least one player on our current roster will take the field in our new stadium while not wearing an NYCFC kit.
I actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?Would you make the same wager now, including anyone signed through the end of the summer transfer window? (meaning the assumption we sign some big named, multi-year signing.)
I will take care of escrow.I actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?
i will currently take the current deal with the current stipulationsI actually worded it specifically to not include any players joining later in the season. But for you buddy I’ll wager a kosher pastrami & corned beef sandwich on rye + Dr browns black cherry, brought to a game at the new stadium by the loser. And include your new terms. Deal?