I read the Pirlo thing from that article and now just re-read it and it's not mentioned there, you are right.
Adding fuel to the fire.
I read the Pirlo thing from that article and now just re-read it and it's not mentioned there, you are right.
Adding fuel to the fire.
Like I said, rumors may not be 100% true but all rumors are based on smoke. Something took place. This isn't pure fiction - very few outlets would ever print pure fiction while putting their credibility up for debate, and BAS isn't in the realm of British tabloids.so we are going to start believing rumors now? from bigapplesoccer...who we have rarely even linked to for anything all season.....all of a sudden have a scoop? ( i know they cover them like they cover all other teams as well but it seems its all just news and thats it).
now with its own thread it will pick up steam and then will be asked and tweeted about for the rest of the week and then asking players and coach and will be something to bother the team with.
this would of made sense under Kreis....and we know he lost the locker room long before the end of the season....how come no team meeting there.
this should of happened after the 7-0 or 4-1 thrashing not after this, when we are still alive.
Like I said, rumors may not be 100% true but all rumors are based on smoke. Something took place. This isn't pure fiction - very few outlets would ever print pure fiction while putting their credibility up for debate, and BAS isn't in the realm of British tabloids.
Yeah, BAS and EoS are different in my eyes. Michael Lewis cut his teeth as a journalist/columnist at actual newspapers long before he started BAS.BAS or Empire of soccer for you in terms of credibility?
Honestly, this was my first thought when we saw the lineup. Not the revolt, but the Pirlo "injury" was some sort of excuse to cover for our negative tactics. Sort of like what Jose does. He's the worst (best?) about building in ready made excuses.The other thing mentioned in that article is a "rumor" (take that as it is) that Pirlo wasn't injured, he saw the lineup and revolted, which was why he was out of the 18 and "injured" last minute in training.
Can't blame him, if I was benched for Mikey Lopez I'd feel the same.
So a different writer saying they're both false is believable without any sort of evidence? If he said he was with Villa when the meeting supposedly took place, then he's in the know, or he has a picture of Pirlo limping (or something else concrete), but a two-word rebuttal is vapid at best.
That's not how journalism works. The writer might be exaggerating, or he might be guessing based off limited information, but there's something there. There is at least a part of this that is true. Reporters don't just make stuff up.
Crooks is a club mouthpiece, IMO. I don't mean that as a criticism (well, just a small one), but he is always buying right into whatever line he's fed.
His post was:I take solace in the fact that the Kitman said the attitude of the team was top notch. That guys doesn't have an agenda.
I will say this. This team. These guys, have A LOT of fight left in them. #family"
His post was:
That could be interpreted a lot of ways, including seeing the "fight" in guys being pissed and blowing up afterwards in heated "discussions." I'm not saying that's what happened, but that scenario would definitely show a lot of fight because they were amped up to play the way they've played all year. And if the majority took that stance, then there'd be solidarity - i.e. Family.
Twitter sucks for many reasons, but especially when not all facts are known.
Yeah, I have so much time on my hands that I type stuff out twice verbatim......your views are so meaningful to you that you posted it twice
Rumors like these don't get started without smoke....
I hate to disparage forum people. So take this as a blast at your comments not at you. But these could be the two most naive comments I've ever read on this forum.Reporters don't just make stuff up.
I take no offense in your comment, but your comment is honestly 10x more naive. There was definitely smoke. To deny that is as you call it naive.I hate to disparage forum people. So take this as a blast at your comments not at you. But these could be the two most naive comments I've ever read on this forum.
ETA: From two forum members I don't think I have ever thought of as naive in the past.
Anyone following any part of what passes for reporting over the last 10 years knows that speculations are regularly reported as truth. No evidence required.
I hate to disparage forum people. So take this as a blast at your comments not at you. But these could be the two most naive comments I've ever read on this forum.
ETA: From two forum members I don't think I have ever thought of as naive in the past.
Anyone following any part of what passes for reporting over the last 10 years knows that speculations are regularly reported as truth. No evidence required.
I take no offense in your comment, but your comment is honestly 10x more naive. There was definitely smoke. To deny that is as you call it naive.
I take no offense in your comment, but your comment is honestly 10x more naive. There was definitely smoke. To deny that is as you call it naive.