Chicago (Home) - Postmatch

Seriously though, not even the condenced highlights have the handball goal. What? No one wants to acknowledge it happened? ridiculous.
 
Pablo Escobar was basically a terrorist who destroyed his home nation, killed many, and caused problems in the US, but he did give a little bit of the money he got from his murders to some poor people, so he wasn't such a bad guy.
Can we save the absurd false equivalencies for a thread that's at least explicitly about politics?
 
They instituted double jeopardy. So a DOGSO foul in the box is a penalty + yellow rather than penalty + red.
I believe you can still get a red plus a penalty for violent conduct on a DOG SO in the box. I think hey just removed the automatic red for “professional/normal course of play" fouls. This is something I don't think many refs even realize or implement.
Double jeopardy applies if the defender is making a play on the ball. If the defender is just playing the man, then you can still get Red + Penalty.

From IFAB.

Players will still be sent off for holding, pulling or pushing, not playing the ball or having no possibility to play the ball, serious foul play, violent conduct or deliberate handball.
Link to video below.

https://matchcenter.mlssoccer.com/m...-city-fc-vs-chicago-fire/details/video/190368
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kangaroo Jack
I didn't take out the danger I took out the actual hit. The point is there was close to no danger outside the one time we scored. We won last night because we put up another shutout -- 4 in 8 games. But outside the PK we had less than 1 xG at home last night. It was still more than Chicago, but the result was pretty much a coin flip. We were due to win one of those. The draws against DC and Montreal had bigger xGDs in our favor that did not go our way. But they were all coin flips.
ETA: We have 3 home clean sheets and only one win, because we're not creating enough good chances, and last night's was both by eye and stats not very different from the 2 draws, except we finally created one very high percentage shot and converted it.
I agree that defense won this one for us, but worth remembering that Maxi hit the post again - a shot that isn't in the game stats for some reason.
 
Three people were escorted out of the supporter section right at the end of the game by police. One walked out on his own, One was surrounded by police but was walking on his own, the last had his arms restrained behind his back by an officer. The murmurings were they were the racists, but then another guy said they were antifa
FWIW for the first time in 5 seasons in 129 I was asked to sit down. At 87’. With nobody behind me (a guy three rows back gave me a WTF nod). Possible that Sri Lanka and April have security on edge.
I hope I'm not furthering on any political discussion, but I noticed a much, much heavier security presence in the Supporters Section last night. I also haven't been asked to show my ticket for my section in years and they asked for that every time I was in/out.
 
The hand-goal was offside before he got close to it.
Was it already whistled offsides though? Perhaps it was and he heard it, but all the NYCFC players didn't appear to think so.

If the play wasn't whistled dead for offsides and he bats it in like that, that has to be a yellow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sabo
Part of the reason for no long range shots was probably the absence of Mitrita and Isi, who love to bomb from deep. I also note that one of our 4 shots was the PK, so we had only 3 shots from open play, and only one of those on target. Thank goodness Taty made that run. We're still not particularly active or successful in the final third. I took out the assist, but this shows every other successful pass and cross on the night. We might have been less dangerous than Chicago in the last 30-40 yards but for that assist (and Chicago was not very dangerous).
View attachment 9746


The point about the upside-down standings tho.

ETA: One of our "open play" shots was from a set piece, so..
I think there is something wrong about the data (or at least it's missing one data point) on MLS' website. They don't show the other shot that Maxi took which went off the crossbar (I couldn't tell if Ousted pushed it onto the bar or not).

ETA: On that play, what a layoff by Taty. I didn't know that he had it in him to make a pass in that particular situation.
 
Was it already whistled offsides though? Perhaps it was and he heard it, but all the NYCFC players didn't appear to think so.

If the play wasn't whistled dead for offsides and he bats it in like that, that has to be a yellow.
The ref was talking to him for a while after the play. I'm guessing he said you're lucky that was offside or you'd have been carded. Not sure if the whistle blew but seems likely the ref thought it did.
 
Was it already whistled offsides though? Perhaps it was and he heard it, but all the NYCFC players didn't appear to think so.

If the play wasn't whistled dead for offsides and he bats it in like that, that has to be a yellow.

It's an automatic yellow for doing that. I remember Kai Kamara doing it to us in Year One.

However, he was off. It was a free kick, and he broke early and was off by at least a yard.
 
The ref was talking to him for a while after the play. I'm guessing he said you're lucky that was offside or you'd have been carded. Not sure if the whistle blew but seems likely the ref thought it did.
It's an automatic yellow for doing that. I remember Kai Kamara doing it to us in Year One.

However, he was off. It was a free kick, and he broke early and was off by at least a yard.
Yeah, I just still see the intent there. Offsides or not, that's a yellow in my (slightly biased) book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jock
Nah. Ask any fascist(nazi) and all Jews should burn. Ask any antifa and all zionists are nazis. Where’s the side that wants to protect the only democratic (non-muslim/Arab) state in Middle East that is pro gay/trans, religious freedom, etc? I thought antifa would support that, but this whole world is insane.

What’s Democratic about creating a second class of citizens and stealing their property?