Portland - Postmatch

Goal one was a mess and it was his job to take command of his domain. I am refusing to rewatch any of the highlights, so you may be correct on goal 2, but in real time I thought that he could have done better. He’s a terrific GK, so I see this as a bad game. Unfortunately the bad games came at the wrong time last season.
Under normal situations I say it’s the GK’s responsibility to call for every ball, but SJ was far enough away and running towards the net, and needing to go through a teammate, that I don’t think he was the best to make the play. Callens was right there and all he need to do was head the ball, either over the bar, or straight up giving SJ a jumping chance at the rebound, or worst case back out into the field. He was right there, it was an easier play for him to make than for SJ.
 
Under normal situations I say it’s the GK’s responsibility to call for every ball, but SJ was far enough away and running towards the net, and needing to go through a teammate, that I don’t think he was the best to make the play. Callens was right there and all he need to do was head the ball, either over the bar, or straight up giving SJ a jumping chance at the rebound, or worst case back out into the field. He was right there, it was an easier play for him to make than for SJ.
SJ needs to be

giphy.gif
 
On Medina and Herrera being on the bench. Same question, asked in two situations...

The Press Conference response (1:10)
“I don’t have to go into details why I’m making decisions.”

Later, the #AskNYCFC response (1:07)
Paraphrasing: When you have quality in the squad, you have to make decisions. Today we have Eben and Rodney start and overall they had a good game. It’s a long season and even players when are playing well, I will have to manage the group quite well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul
I've had some time to think about last night, and it did produce a headache, and while the game is implemented by the players, the match was lost before ever taking the field. PV really screwed up on many many levels.

1. He needed to squash any Arsenal rumors immediately. Take that distraction away from the team and players. I had to watch a college football coach (Jimbo Fisher) dance around job rumors for the last 3 years, and it always affected the program and players, culminating in the shit-show of a season they just had because he let rumors linger all year before finally taking the job. Not dispelling rumors kills the locker room because players don't know if the coach is committed or has one foot out the door. NYCFC's players will always say the right thing, that the Arsenal news/rumors had no effect on them, but that's just savvy responses to questions that keep them out of the club's PR doghouse.

2. Coach's decision regarding player fatigue. That's the reason given for not starting Medina and Herrera last night, since evidently they haven't looked sharp in practice and PV attributes Shradi-Tajores' injury to over-use. I buy that and believe it's totally legitimate. However, it really shows that PV let things get too far before taking action. We have a deep squad, but not yet a talented squad that can maintain first-11 quality when inserting multiple second-11 players. Unless a match is against Atlanta/Toronto/SKC or another top team, he should be rotating 1 second-11 guy into the starting roster as a precautionary measure; I'm not even sure we can handle doing 2 guys rotated in, but by constantly doing 1, it's giving guys a break every 7ish weeks. Obviously injuries will also dictate this. Yesterday, we couldn't handle having both Medina and Herrera sit out. Had either have gotten a rest in the last few weeks, then perhaps only one would have needed to sit.

3. Squad rotation - using the entire squad. Yesterday had only one offensive sub on the roster. One. That's malpractice on PV's part, and it's not the first time he's hamstrung the team with his bench. Lewis should have made the bench; for whatever reasons PV has him in the doghouse, it shouldn't be at the expense of the team. Our forwards we bad yesterday - they had zero movement. Medina needed to come on as did another attacking player, but the only "real" options on the bench were TMac and Herrera. TMac didn't look bad since he didn't need to run/chase, and Herrera should have come on earlier to add some muscle and height. But even with those two showing better than the starters, the offense needed a second (if not a third) spark in the attack. At what point does the club tell PV enough is enough and stop tying your hands before the opening kickoff???? There were matches last year when Mix could have been used instead of Mikey, and yesterday Lewis should have started over Wallace (if Medina wasn't going to start).

3a. Tinner also looked tired, considering his bad touches. For a guy that always goes 110percent, has he needed a break with SAS getting a few minutes. Hindsight is 20/20, but with Portland bunkering yesterday, SAS would have been a good alternative.

4. PV needs to stop inserting players like he's playing Playstation FIFA. The Role Herrera plays is that of a strong tackler and holding outlet. Ofori's style isn't that - he's hesitant to throw his body into challenges. Playing him there was just wrong; either play Ring or Maxi as the #8 with Ofori taking their spot. Same with Wallace - he's not a talented attacker, he's a defensive, fore-checking attacker that is there to harass - the guy hasn't scored in 11 months and based on his miss yesterday, he may not ever score again even facing an open net from 5 feet away. Considering the way we play, Wallace can never be inserted at the wing if the goal is creativity - his role should really be to help close out matches when the other team is chasing and he can harass.

5. PV needs to do a better job of in-match instructions. So many times the team would be attacking down the left side, with the ball deep and Mata would kill the play because he'd refuse to push it forward to either Berget or another player moving into the corner; instead choosing to pull it back to towards midfield and Callens. One time, fine. Twice, ok. Three times, and Mata is just protecting possession. But it kept happening over and over and over, and PV didn't do anything about it. I don't know what was going through Mata's head, but it wasn't offense because he never took anybody on, and if he's not using his speed and technical ability, then he has zero place on the field (because he sure wasn't playing defense yesterday since Callens was having to cover the left time and again). And I put Mata's shit show on PV for not changing things up or giving him new instructions. Hell, if he wasn't going to attack from the FB position, and PV wasn't willing to sub him, then push him up as a wing to occupy a defender and spread the defense - something, anything to make Portland rethink their tactics. Or even move him into the middle of the field to carry the ball forward with speed right up the middle spine. But no, it was always a pass back to Callens.

6. Substitutions. There's no rule that subs have to be made at 60+ minutes. When the team looks bad, stir things up at 45min. Sends a message and it gives the subs a chance to integrate themselves into the match. 60min is cutting it close to get the necessary amount of touches that a guy like Medina needs. How much impact can Herrera make when he only gets 11 minutes? 3rd year in and PV still doesn't have a feel for the subs.

7. Tactics. We saw against Atlanta that when Maxi is deep, nothing happens, but when high he's able to ignite the attack. Why was he dropping deep from the get-go? It's like PV doesn't learn from matches about what works and what fundamentally doesn't. He can try to shove a square peg into a round hole a million times, but it's never going to fit, and if by some miracle it does, it's an aberration from wearing down the edges/corners, not because of a stroke of genius. and further, if possession for the sake of possession isn't working, what's Plan B???? Does the team ever practice for a Plan B????? I feel like Pep has a Plan B that he pulls out at times, not many because almost never needed, so why doesn't PV????
 
Without a ton of analysis, I thought we were playing a lot of long crosses into the box yesterday. A ton more than normal, and it wasn't when Berget was available as a target. It was quite peculiar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulrich
Berget and Wallace can't play as wingers at the same time. No creativity between the two of them. Berget was fine, Wallace was shit. If one of them is playing, they need a creative winger opposite them in Shradi or Medina. Having both was cumbersome and allowed Portland to bottleneck Maxi and Villa. Without Maxi/Villa on the ball, we looked lost and confused.

Basic problem that has a simple solution of adding a creative winger. That will open up the offensive 3rd having an extra creative option.

Surprised Villa and Berget didn't switch more often. would've given Villa more space if he had gone out on the left with Berget in the middle.

I had hopes for Ofori but he definitely didn't show me too much. Not going to say he's complete shit, but still need to see something more from him. Maybe he's out of place sometimes in our midfield, depending on who he is subbing for/ replacing.

We need to get rid of our zonal marking on corners. We look lost on every corner we defend, and multiple guys seem to end up open on the opposing side.

See how the team reacts against Dallas. Hopefully much better at home.

EDIT:
Team also looked tired psychologically. They were still making runs (sometimes retarded ones) but they were out of it from the start. No fire, no will, no desire.
 
So much crap with this game it's difficult to lay blame. Medium and long range passes were way off. The turf may have been an issue for some. Other than that, the were slow without any sense of urgency. Except Ring who busts his ass every game. Don't think this was a good indicator of who we are.

Berget doesn't fit. He provides little speed and that gives defenders an easier time double marking Villa. If you want to try Villa on the left and have Berget as a target man, maybe. But this isn't working for me.
 
This game was like any of the Liverpool-Man City games from the CL this year. We looked a lot better in the second half, but had already played into a huge hole. Everyone was basically shit and I think we desperately need Villa to get one in the run of play this weekend. Even some of the greats need confidence boosters. Dallas doesn't terrify me, but we need a good showing and a win at home to get our swag back.
 
EDIT:
Team also looked tired psychologically. They were still making runs (sometimes retarded ones) but they were out of it from the start. No fire, no will, no desire.
I think there's a lot to this. An awesome, emotionally draining draw at Atlanta in front of a crazy crowd, to then travel across the country (closest to as far as you can travel between weeks in this league) to play in front of another crazy crowd in their second home game of the year.

I'm not completely surprised at the result of this game. That said, I don't think that is an excuse for the squad and PV will need to figure out how to manage the team from not only a lineup perspective (this has been discussed a lot already), but also from a psychological perspective.
 
How many games into the season before we start get a definite answer to the question of whether Villa still has it or not, too?

I know stats are cold comfort today, but Villa's 0.90 xG+xA/96 right now is higher than he's ever managed over a full MLS season. The fact that he's getting involved in chances like that while still visibly shaking off some rust is a really positive sign. Reminds me of Ronaldo's season:

 
That's fair. When does it go from insanely premature to appropriate?

Given Villa's track record? I don't know, 20 games? Hard to know when's the right time to cut a club legend coming back from injury.

Right now, he's played not even four games-worth of minutes, scoring twice with two assists. I don't know what we'd be arguing if his name was Danny Villa, but if his name was Jonathan Lewis we'd probably be begging Vieira to give him more game time.
 
Given Villa's track record? I don't know, 20 games? Hard to know when's the right time to cut a club legend coming back from injury.

Right now, he's played not even four games-worth of minutes, scoring twice with two assists. I don't know what we'd be arguing if his name was Danny Villa, but if his name was Jonathan Lewis we'd probably be begging Vieira to give him more game time.
Especially when nearly every player around him played like a turd. Villa scoring doesn't even make this game close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
I know stats are cold comfort today, but Villa's 0.90 xG+xA/96 right now is higher than he's ever managed over a full MLS season. The fact that he's getting involved in chances like that while still visibly shaking off some rust is a really positive sign.

Right now, he's played not even four games-worth of minutes, scoring twice with two assists. I don't know what we'd be arguing if his name was Danny Villa, but if his name was Jonathan Lewis we'd probably be begging Vieira to give him more game time.

The problem might not be his goals per minute, or his xGoals, but his minutes per game. Over the last 18 games going back to September 6 last year, including the 2 playoff games that he played in full, he has played an average of only 52 minutes per game. Maybe he doesn't miss any more time due to injury the rest of the year, but that's not a bet I'm likely to take.
 
The problem might not be his goals per minute, or his xGoals, but his minutes per game. Over the last 18 games going back to September 6 last year, including the 2 playoff games that he played in full, he has played an average of only 52 minutes per game. Maybe he doesn't miss any more time due to injury the rest of the year, but that's not a bet I'm likely to take.

Sure, his minutes are going to be limited at 36 even when he's healthy. But I think we can separate the question of whether Villa still has it from whether Villa has a 2500-minute season in him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
Sure, his minutes are going to be limited at 36 even when he's healthy. But I think we can separate the question of whether Villa still has it from whether Villa has a 3000-minute season in him.
Why bother?
If you care personally as an intellectual pursuit to distinguish them, OK. But if his production suffers because of his age, I really don't care if it's because he's slow or because he can't play much.