I'm not sure if Brek would be at the top of my list, but if we sold Mix tomorrow at value, we'd be a better team for it.Hindsight is always 20/20.
If you could do it over again, would you have signed Brek Shea (who we passed on for Orlando) in lieu of signing Mix?
What actually *is* Mix's natural role? Have we really answered that?That's silly. I think in a vacuum, Mix is the better player. By a wide margin.
But he can't play his natural role here. I think it would have been interesting to see Brek Shea flying down the wing instead of Ned Grabavoy last year.
To properly answer this we would all need to see a full season of Mix playing in position. Unfortunately, we are still probably two years away from having seen that.I'm not sure if Brek would be at the top of my list, but if we sold Mix tomorrow at value, we'd be a better team for it.
I don't see the upside that you guys do with him. He's a very technically sound player, but he doesn't do a ton with it.
What actually *is* Mix's natural role? Have we really answered that?
What's his "proper position" though?To properly answer this we would all need to see a full season of Mix playing in position. Unfortunately, we are still probably two years away from having seen that.
CMWhat's his "proper position" though?
After tonight clearly Cm next to Pirlo
After tonight clearly Cm next to Pirlo
Not sure if serious.Hindsight is always 20/20.
If you could do it over again, would you have signed Brek Shea (who we passed on for Orlando) in lieu of signing Mix?
I touched on this a few months ago, I think he is best in a midfield 3. He's not a DM, he's not a pure number 10, he's james Milner type in his work rate and versatility but also in the sense that he doesn't "own" the game.What's his "proper position" though?
I thought it was a really well rationalized characterization: http://nycfcblues.com/2015/11/managing-expectations-can-expect-mix-diskerud/. It's far more analytical than the way I tend to think of the game, but I can't help but agree with the conclusion.I touched on this a few months ago, I think he is best in a midfield 3. He's not a DM, he's not a pure number 10, he's james Milner type in his work rate and versatility but also in the sense that he doesn't "own" the game.
Thank you very much.I thought it was a really well rationalized characterization: http://nycfcblues.com/2015/11/managing-expectations-can-expect-mix-diskerud/. It's far more analytical than the way I tend to think of the game, but I can't help but agree with the conclusion.
That midfield would get abused while defending. There's no way that Lampard could play as a winger or outside midfielder, and I'm not sure Poku contributes as much on the outside.So maybe a 4-4-2?
-Villa-Shelton-
Lampard-Pirlo-Mix-Poku
Defense
Saunders
Agree with this. Mix had a couple of good through balls. Also, full credit to Mullins for dummying the pass through to Poku.Be sure to watch the pass to Poku for the goal vs PR if you still question Mix's talent. If that was Pirlo hitting that pass there would be fainting hysterics all over the board.
Be sure to watch the pass to Poku for the goal vs PR if you still question Mix's talent. If that was Pirlo hitting that pass there would be fainting hysterics all over the board.
This!This is entirely correct. Think also of the pass he made to help set up one of Lampard's late season goals. He was on the sideline with his back to the goal. The ball came to him, and he popped it up in the air, then kicked it backwards over his head hitting a teammate in stride who laid off to Lamps for the goal. It was Mix's pass that broke the defense.
Great cross, but no. Mix's overhead, no look was superior, imho.No RJ Allen for Poku overhead kick in the USOC?