Until this tweet talking about him being a local product, I thought FC Motown was in Detroit.Yooooo LMAO.....RJ Allen is in FC motown now playing vs RB U 23
EDIT:
Until this post about that tweet, I thought FC Motown was in Detroit.Until this tweet talking about him being a local product, I thought FC Motown was in Detroit.
On one hand, lol Cosmos. On the other hand, this Hartford team has more USOC wins than NYCFC does.
Hartford are my more local team though I'm still more invested in NYCFC I'm glad to see them finally get their first win. It should be clarified that this was Cosmos B they beat so not precisely a shining achievement .
while its the "B" cosmos team, it is their main team. They have to be a "B" team in order to play in NPSL so then if any when they are allowed to be back in a pro league they can use the Cosmos name with out the B.
still, the quality of players probably still not of the old NASL. they have few players that have played in USL championship teams and internationals, the rest is made up of college kids from area.
I understand the intent to schedule regional matches to cut down to travel logistics, but it’s getting rather old to be in the same pot every year with NE/RB. Variety is needed since lower-division progression cannot be counted on. Would be nice if this sub group, and the adjacent geographical region, is randomly drawn from NE/RB/NYC/PHL/DC so that one has 2/other 3 and it can be a rotating set of possibilities each year. Same could be set up for other regions of the country because how often do fans of Portland/Seattle or Houston/Dallas or LA/LA want to be drawn together? It’s inevitable that travel is required, and on the off-chance a lower team gets drawn with an MLS club a few states away, there should be supplemental travel expenses/support from the Cup org.ok so round 2 is done and round 3 is on May 28/29. im going to assume that what will happen is we are in the east "block" with NJRB, NE and the winner of the memphis/ hartford game. then the draw will happen there.
I understand the intent to schedule regional matches to cut down to travel logistics, but it’s getting rather old to be in the same pot every year with NE/RB. Variety is needed since lower-division progression cannot be counted on. Would be nice if this sub group, and the adjacent geographical region, is randomly drawn from NE/RB/NYC/PHL/DC so that one has 2/other 3 and it can be a rotating set of possibilities each year. Same could be set up for other regions of the country because how often do fans of Portland/Seattle or Houston/Dallas or LA/LA want to be drawn together? It’s inevitable that travel is required, and on the off-chance a lower team gets drawn with an MLS club a few states away, there should be supplemental travel expenses/support from the Cup org.
This is correct.I understand the intent to schedule regional matches to cut down to travel logistics, but it’s getting rather old to be in the same pot every year with NE/RB. Variety is needed since lower-division progression cannot be counted on. Would be nice if this sub group, and the adjacent geographical region, is randomly drawn from NE/RB/NYC/PHL/DC so that one has 2/other 3 and it can be a rotating set of possibilities each year. Same could be set up for other regions of the country because how often do fans of Portland/Seattle or Houston/Dallas or LA/LA want to be drawn together? It’s inevitable that travel is required, and on the off-chance a lower team gets drawn with an MLS club a few states away, there should be supplemental travel expenses/support from the Cup org.
On one hand, lol Cosmos. On the other hand, this Hartford team has more USOC wins than NYCFC does.
This is correct.
Plus, if an MLS team is drawn into a group with 2 other MLS teams and 1 lower division team, then the odds are 2/3 that it will play another MLS team. The odds are different, obviously, if that team is in a group that has only 1 other MLS team. Long story short - if we are drawn into the same group every year, we are being given a more difficult draw than other teams.