Not to be argumentative, but is Pelligrini putting NYCFC into a subservient role not a "development" in this process?
There is something we are missing here.
There has to be a reason for all this excitement other than one mans vague statement and an excitable press.
At the minute Lampard is contracted to MCFC, on loan from NYCFC.
What has Frank, New York, or the MLS, or even Man City actually said that makes things any different
"Lampard is a good player and I wish we could keep him as he has contributed so much to the team, but it is not my decision"
does not equal
"Lampard is staying because he is Man Cities most valuable asset, and the good people of New York will have to stuff it and put up with Scott Sinclair instead!"
Incidently Scott Sinclair is on a SEASON LONG LOAN at West Brom with a view to a permanent move !!