Am I the only one who WOULD take Iheanacho over Lampard? The kids a stud and we could even convince them to keep Lampard out of that ends up being the case. Would love to have him here.
For football reasons, you may be able to make that argument (but it'd be tough, IMO).Am I the only one who WOULD take Iheanacho over Lampard? The kids a stud and we could even convince them to keep Lampard out of that ends up being the case. Would love to have him here.
the fact that they want to keep lampard and not call up this adds to my frustration.Am I the only one who WOULD take Iheanacho over Lampard? The kids a stud and we could even convince them to keep Lampard out of that ends up being the case. Would love to have him here.
Voetball International (Dutch news source) are reporting that MCFC are close to signing Wesley Sneijder as Lampard's replacement. Maybe his loan will go ahead as planned.
Send Wesley. Keep Lampard. Wesley is cup tied and Lampard is homegrown.
im thinking opposite - keep wesley and send lampard.... hes not exactly pledging his allegiance to the club or fan base at this point
I would love Wesley, but I am going to wait until it comes true.. Because just recently it was being reporting Manchester United would be after him and that is some tough competition.
Yea it was my mistake, I misread it and thought it said NYCFC were going to sign Sneijder, and was a little shocked by that. I can easily see Man City getting him over United.but United are crap
and more importantly not from Manchester
Just to be clear, they aren't suggesting Sneijder will come to New York, just that he may replace Lampard. That would suggest Lampard is going to be back here in Jan/Feb.