Troll. Please ban
Frank Lampard Loan Extension
- Thread starter JCizzle
- Start date
- Status
Bluemoon
Registered
Ha ha the troll shit again,only reporting what's in the media across the pond.
franchise646
Registered
You seem not to have been here long enough to realize we have sent messages to Both team NYCFC and MCFC and coming here telling us to chill out isn't doing you any favors, especially with the constant reporting on both sides of the ocean. We are letting the teams know that we as fans of NYC aren't going to support that. There is a wedge right now between Manchester fans and New York fans. The Manchester Fans coming here defending there team by telling us to chill out are trolling are inflaming the situation. BTW dude you came at me you apologized to others but you came at me for saying that I don't agree with that like the idea of Man City keeping our player for honestly any added period of time, because our resources are more limited than yours. Yes I reported you cause If I responded the why I want to I get the banned, but you are keeping on this track. We are waiting to see BUT it is up to us to let them know we are watching and we will let MCFC and NYCFC what we think of the news that we are hearing and on a NYC forum yeah you are going to hear a NYC fan say we aren't ok extend the loan of a NYC player to MCFC. I'm not saying people form Manchester are, but New Yorkers aren't sheep, we are loud we will tell what we are thinking and if you don't like, cover your ears. Remember this is a NYCFC forum we are going to tell what we are thinking it won't always be "ok we'll deal with it".
Last edited:
grandsolo
Registered
you need to rethink your definition of trolling. Fucks sake there are some precious egos on here.
It's not really "banter" at all. There's a difference between good natured banter and a manifestation of an imbalanced power relationship between two clubs. I'd sure as hell hope that Chelsea fans don't go over to Vitesse's boards, prancing around like sugar-craved kids in a candy shop.
MANCHESTER MCFC
Registered
Ok...
1) yeah misread it
2)I quoted the person it was aimed at,it wasn't a random post aimed at everyone.
3)your 100% wrong
4) I'll agree.....wasn't intentional,possibly worded wrong,hence my apology.
The villa comment was aimed at him due to comments like"I have a problem with other teams TAKING our players"
Did we send the SAS over to kidnap lampard?......"TAKING OUR PLAYERS"?...do me a favour.
A deal was discussed,agreed and happened,no you ain't happy about it,but it's happened.
Loan moves happen in football,no rules were broken,nothing.As I posted earlier if he ain't there for the start of your season,I'll agree with you it's out of order.
Question.......if you were running your own business and I turned up out of the blue,telling your to run it in a certain way,what would you say to me?
David_Villa
Registered
Reports in Turkey that Lampard could be replaced at NYCFC with Sneijder, while Lampard remains at City. How would you feel about that?
franchise646
Registered
As long as Lampard is striped of his DP status so we can recoup that spot and get our money back and use it one someone else.
Sneijder is younger and a better fit, I'd prefer him. I wonder if that rumor envisions him as swapping with Lampard in the summer then, or staying in New York full time.
If the CBA adds a 4th DP, and NYCFC is given Villa, Sneijder, and a third DP in January, plus Lampard joining the team after the EPL season is over, I think that will quiet a lot of the complaints. I'd be laughing all the way through to the MLS Cup.
When the exchange benefits one team to the detriment of the team that owns his contract, I would absolutely call that "taking".
You all are right that nothing's finalized yet, but I've seen enough of this to know that this isn't a fight NYCFC is likely to win.
Guys, this is silly. Yes, @MANCHESTER MCFC's first post was out of line, but he actually realised it was out of line and stepped back from it. Since then, I've seen nothing from him which is worthy of mod involvement. He may have kept defending his argument, but he's not crossed the line with any of what he said afterwards. We said we'd allow you to argue this issue out and we're doing just that. If he steps out of line again then fine, we'll notice and we'll respond. Until then, please just get back to the topic at hand.
As for @Bluemoon's post - there needs to be some give and take here. @Bluemoon - as you yourself identified, this is not the thread for banter. You should know well enough that banter only works when both sides are willing to play along, and bantering with someone who doesn't enjoy it usually provokes a hostile response. Furthermore, this is an NYCFC forum. If you can't write with a conciliatory tone and at least try to understand NYCFC's point of view and accept it, you're not going to be accepted here by the rest of the posters, no matter whether you claim your comments were innocent or not.
For the rest of you who responded to his message - what he said was really quite minor. He didn't aim it at anyone, he didn't criticise the club or tell anyone to put up or shut up. The only thing objectionable about his post was that it implied a negative tone. I know we try to be quite hot on the "no flaming, no baiting" rules, but there has to be at least some willingness amongst the general populace to ignore mild passive aggression. This isn't kindergarten - we can't just jump in to intervene every time someone looks at someone else funny. If you really don't like it, use the "Ignore" function. That's what it's there for. But it would be far better if people were willing to accept the odd jibe.
Let's get back to debating Lampard now.
As for @Bluemoon's post - there needs to be some give and take here. @Bluemoon - as you yourself identified, this is not the thread for banter. You should know well enough that banter only works when both sides are willing to play along, and bantering with someone who doesn't enjoy it usually provokes a hostile response. Furthermore, this is an NYCFC forum. If you can't write with a conciliatory tone and at least try to understand NYCFC's point of view and accept it, you're not going to be accepted here by the rest of the posters, no matter whether you claim your comments were innocent or not.
For the rest of you who responded to his message - what he said was really quite minor. He didn't aim it at anyone, he didn't criticise the club or tell anyone to put up or shut up. The only thing objectionable about his post was that it implied a negative tone. I know we try to be quite hot on the "no flaming, no baiting" rules, but there has to be at least some willingness amongst the general populace to ignore mild passive aggression. This isn't kindergarten - we can't just jump in to intervene every time someone looks at someone else funny. If you really don't like it, use the "Ignore" function. That's what it's there for. But it would be far better if people were willing to accept the odd jibe.
Let's get back to debating Lampard now.
If you guys think their comments are fine, don't be surprised by the way some people respond who disagree with you. You'll be left with a nice forum of mcfc fans who can talk about NYC from Manchester.
We're not banning Man City fans the same way we're not banning fans of Roma/United/RBNY (there's more than you think here).
Calling for a ban will not make one happen. Chill.
I still vote to ban ManU "supporters". But I'm just one guy.
I'm a man City fan. Why's that so wrong? MCFC introduced a lot of people to this club. I, however, respect the fact this is a NYCFC forum and put my MCFC allegiances to the side.
franchise646
Registered
You seem to be rare lately. Meant to add lol
JCizzle
Registered
I'm with you man. Very much behind Man City so being a fan of NYCFC became a very easy transition. I'll still be a big fan of Man City. Seems a lot of anger towards Man City. I think we should all be able to root for our EPL (or other league club) AND NYCFC without any issues.
- Status
