Ladies and Gents, long time no post.
I wrote a rebuttal piece to Raf's "New York City FC is a farm club" piece, it's almost done in forum form in my piece as I address several of his most important premises/conclusions (including the post-publish tweets he made to address criticisms as well) one by one. It makes it a long piece, but it also organizes it based on common, various accusations reasons for the "farm club" accusations.
New York City FC is NOT a Farm Club:
http://soccernewsday.com/usa/a/2181/new-york-city-fc-is-not-a-farm-team-
I'd like to see what you think. Even if don't want to read the whole thing, I'd ask you to at least skip down to my rebuttal of this part, which is a major crux of his argument, and my rebuttal, a major crux of mine:
“What's CFG's incentive to treat New York City FC differently from Manchester City in the future, given the centrality of Manchester City FC to CFG?”
I think there is plenty of incentive (and that CFG have vision for it, as I explain why directly above that part) to treat NYCFC like a very important club, and in many ways already have and certainly will improve in this direction. I think it's obvious why, but I explain why in details, because it's clearly not obvious to everyone out there.
Please let me what you think. Am I crazy? Am I an apologist? Or does this stuff make sense to you? For me this is all clear as day, but maybe I'm just in denial/delusional? You be the judge, but I ask you to leave your emotion/preconceived notions at the door and give it a fair read if you have the time. And please share it if you agree! Appreciate it!