Man City Discussion

Ah, I might have understood it backwards in that case
Not necessarily.This is not worth the explanation but here I go anyway:
MC gave up a goal to MU that was similar to NYC in that it involved pathetic play -- not quite a turnover but close -- right in front of goal. So I said very CFG
You said that's Typical City.
I said but they're not because they -- MC -- score set pieces, which they did twice today and we did roughly twice all season.
 
Not necessarily.This is not worth the explanation but here I go anyway:
MC gave up a goal to MU that was similar to NYC in that it involved pathetic play -- not quite a turnover but close -- right in front of goal. So I said very CFG
You said that's Typical City.
I said but they're not because they -- MC -- score set pieces, which they did twice today and we did roughly twice all season.
Well it could be used either way so that's fine, no prob. But regardless, 11 points clear at the top of the table, 14 wins in a row in the EPL this season. Crazy.
 
I know Pogba was missing for United but it's crazy when City can elect to not use Aguero even off the bench for this match and it's no problem. Of course the Aguero to leave in January rumors (especially if City sign Sanchez) are heating up again. Personally I'd rather keep Sergio...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
I know Pogba was missing for United but it's crazy when City can elect to not use Aguero even off the bench for this match and it's no problem. Of course the Aguero to leave in January rumors (especially if City sign Sanchez) are heating up again. Personally I'd rather keep Sergio...
I'm not sure if it was "no problem", necessarily. United/Mourinho were successful in preventing City's attacking juggernaut from scoring from open play, and even really taking very many good shots (relatively speaking). If Lukaku hadn't made two defensive errors during those set pieces and all else being equal this match ends 1-0 to United and the narrative is very different.

Could Agüero have made a difference? Hard to say. Clearly Pep didn't think so. Or, he felt Sterling was better for the pseudo-false 9 thing he was sort of doing.
 
I know Pogba was missing for United but it's crazy when City can elect to not use Aguero even off the bench for this match and it's no problem. Of course the Aguero to leave in January rumors (especially if City sign Sanchez) are heating up again. Personally I'd rather keep Sergio...
I think it would be a mistake to let Aguero go.

I'm not sure if it was "no problem", necessarily. United/Mourinho were successful in preventing City's attacking juggernaut from scoring from open play, and even really taking very many good shots (relatively speaking). If Lukaku hadn't made two defensive errors during those set pieces and all else being equal this match ends 1-0 to United and the narrative is very different.

Could Agüero have made a difference? Hard to say. Clearly Pep didn't think so. Or, he felt Sterling was better for the pseudo-false 9 thing he was sort of doing.
I kind of agree with you, here. Thought it was about as mundane as City has looked all year. Pep didn't help matters by going to 3 CBs and putting Sterling there. I think that played into manu almost getting back in the game. Interesting that the best manager in the world is still apt to do that kind of thing, as it's one of my pet peeves. It seems to never accomplish anything but put your own team on the back foot.

I still can't get over how often the rub of the grass is going City's way. They are obviously the best team, but every bounce is seemingly in their favor. SMH compared to my team's luck.
 
I'm not sure if it was "no problem", necessarily. United/Mourinho were successful in preventing City's attacking juggernaut from scoring from open play, and even really taking very many good shots (relatively speaking). If Lukaku hadn't made two defensive errors during those set pieces and all else being equal this match ends 1-0 to United and the narrative is very different.

Could Agüero have made a difference? Hard to say. Clearly Pep didn't think so. Or, he felt Sterling was better for the pseudo-false 9 thing he was sort of doing.

You could also argue if City didn’t botch a clearance United wouldn’t have had so much as a sniff at goal.
Otamendi miss timed header and then ricochet off Delph is the only reason they scored.
 
I watched the Merseyside and Manchester derby with a buddy who a Liverpool fan. Apparently anyone but United is a strong feeling with a lot of fanbases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
DeBruyne has really turned it on. And you may be right - hard to balance vs. Forward positions. And then you have DeGea...

Coutinho had a hat trick like 10 days ago, so he's not exactly struggling.
Certainty not struggling, but my point being, he is also not certainly in the conversation among the world elites. Very good player though.
 
Certainty not struggling, but my point being, he is also not certainly in the conversation among the world elites. Very good player though.

DeBruyne is better now, he wasn't notably better when we had this discussion before. Both are elite. If you're in the top 10 in the world at your position, that's elite.

If Barca is offering 140 million pounds, you're elite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee